Cover Image: July 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Readers Respond to "A Chemical Red Flag"--and More














Share on Tumblr



March/April 2012 Issue Image: Scientific American Mind

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

A CHEMICAL RED FLAG

Regarding “How Packaged Food Makes Girls Hyper,” by Aimee Cunningham [Head Lines], it is possible that a high level of BPA in the mother is a symptom of a different underlying problem, rather than the cause of the behavioral issues in young children.

The sources of BPA in humans are commonly packaging from processed foods and beverages that may themselves contain many other additives. High BPA levels probably correlate with poor diet and nutrition, as well as with higher levels of caffeine, artificial sweeteners, colors and flavors, all of which some studies link causally with behavioral problems in children.

Parents with poor social support or less education may resort to these kinds of foods more often, and thus it may be that disadvantage, social isolation or parental neglect is responsible for some of the three-year-old girls who were “more anxious, depressed and hyperactive” and who had “more difficulty … controlling their emotions and inhibiting behaviors.”

That said, it is self-evident that endocrine disruptors and chemicals that mimic hormones—such as BPA—might have dramatic effects on fetal development and subsequent behavior in childhood and on the timing of puberty.

“Dr Jane”
commenting at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind

MEAT EATERS' MORALITY

“The Carnivore's Dilemma,” by Morgen E. Peck [Head Lines], showed that there was some difference among the mind-sets of people who knew they were about to eat meat as compared with people who were about to eat a nonmeat snack.

Personally, I think this is a beneficial adaptation because any reservations about eating anything, especially something as nutritious as meat, would put a lot of negative selection pressure on the individual harboring these feelings. Basically, because even our closest ancestors are mostly vegetarian, anybody in the Homo genus that was grossed out by meat had a much lower probability of passing on their genes.

Because most Americans eat too much meat anyway, it would help a lot if people gave more thought to how much land, water, food, energy and other resources were used and to the sacrifices made by the animal that provided the meat they are eating before going overboard with their meat consumption. If these facts were more present in people's minds, wasting meat would be less of a problem.

“sault”
commenting at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind

PREGNANCY BRAIN

I wonder why “The Problem with the Pill,” by Janelle Weaver [Head Lines], did not mention the fact that the pill changes the hormonal body balance into a virtual “pregnancy” mode, which in turn can change a woman's mood into moodiness (as I can attest from past personal experience).

Many studies have also shown that, with prolonged use of the pill, there is a definite loss of libido as a side effect to be taken into account. These effects could explain the study's findings; for instance, that pill users think their mates are less sexually attractive.

“sunnystrobe”
commenting at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind

EMOTIONS IN ADDICTION

“The Nuts and Bolts of Emotional Sobriety,” by Wray Herbert [We're Only Human], reminded me of my own experience.

As a kid, I was taught that it was inappropriate to show feelings. I incorporated the belief that it was also inappropriate to have feelings. I was in counseling briefly when I was 25 or so, and when the counselor asked me, “How do you feel about that?” I had absolutely no concept of what she was talking about.


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. eeyoredragon 10:45 AM 6/22/12

    Blood alcohol testing is a pretty recent thing. (1927?) The first functional portable device was invented in 1954. "Until these types of issues are resolved, public sentiment concerning the moral nature or medical efficacy of the drug is irrelevant." rings pretty hollow IMO.

    Should we be doing more research? Sure. Most certainly. The kind of thinking above however is just a simple means to shut the door on the topic. It's an irrelevant discussion until we know more about it. But when are we going to spend time and money researching something that's irrelevant?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Readers Respond to "A Chemical Red Flag"--and More: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X