Cover Image: July 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Readers Respond to "A Chemical Red Flag"--and More














Share on Tumblr

Many years later, trying to get sober, I began to learn what feelings were, how to identify them and, most important, what to tuck away for later and what to deal with now—as this article describes. I learned that feelings, although they may hurt, cannot harm me unless I let them. I remember well the very first time that I felt joy and was able to identify and enjoy it. Wow!

I learned all the techniques in this article and put them into practice with a good deal of success. It's been a really good life for the past 40 years. Moreover, I learned it all in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), long before the days of formal credentialing for addictions counseling and cognitive-behavior therapy.

It still amazes me that these pioneers in recovery were so insightful and so far ahead of their time. Maybe they did not have the science, but it is clear to many of us that they damn well knew how to get sober and recover.

As former head of the Chemical Dependency Counselor program at Suffolk Community College on Long Island, I think the formal study of addiction and the practice of counseling have come a very long way since then, but in some ways not all that much has really changed. We will always owe a lot to the founders of AA.

“cccambell38”
commenting at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind

MARIJUANA'S EFFECTS

“The Truth about Pot,” by Hal Arkowitz and Scott O. Lilienfeld [Facts and Fictions in Mental Health], is a good article that goes over many of the issues surrounding marijuana. But I don't think that we as a society are talking about the most important issue. When people use alcohol, a drug that we have a lot of information about, we have legal guidelines concerning how intoxicated a user is. We have test equipment, and police officers are trained to use it to keep the public safe from abusers. The problem with marijuana is that it is very difficult to know how intoxicated or affected someone is who smokes pot. There is no rating system concerning the potency of the drug, and the residual effects can last for days. When a train engineer crashes his locomotive into an oncoming passenger train, are we able to say how much his use of marijuana two days prior to the accident affected his performance?

Until these types of issues are resolved, public sentiment concerning the moral nature or medical efficacy of the drug is irrelevant.

“LongbowMike”
commenting at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind

As a marriage counselor, I've had lots of clients over the years who were addicted to pot. One thing that I find always missing from these drug studies is the effect of drug use or abuse on relationships. I would guess that about half the couples I see for counseling are experiencing adverse impacts of drugs and alcohol on their marriage.

Many times the chronic pot user seems to have puer eternis, or arrested development, and still relates to the world like a teenager.

“pabloson”
commenting at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind


Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. eeyoredragon 10:45 AM 6/22/12

    Blood alcohol testing is a pretty recent thing. (1927?) The first functional portable device was invented in 1954. "Until these types of issues are resolved, public sentiment concerning the moral nature or medical efficacy of the drug is irrelevant." rings pretty hollow IMO.

    Should we be doing more research? Sure. Most certainly. The kind of thinking above however is just a simple means to shut the door on the topic. It's an irrelevant discussion until we know more about it. But when are we going to spend time and money researching something that's irrelevant?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Readers Respond to "A Chemical Red Flag"--and More: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X