Cover Image: March 2013 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

MIND Reviews: Mastermind

MIND Reviews: Mastermind














Share on Tumblr

Mastermind, How to think like Sherlock Holmes, Maria Konnikova

Image: Viking Adult

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

Elementary Mind-Set: Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes
by Maria Konnikova
Viking Adult, 2013 ($26.95)

Long before science revealed that synapses fire in patterns, literature endeavored to map the cognitive landscape. From Odysseus restraining himself against the Sirens' song to Tom Sawyer conning his way out of painting fences, fictional characters have captured many nuances of human psychology. Perhaps no character has articulated the science of thinking as directly as Sherlock Holmes, the great consulting detective created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Holmes's prescient insights into the human mind form the basis of Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes, by science writer Konnikova.

Holmes's ability to solve the most confounding mysteries armed only with the ordinary human senses makes him a credible self-improvement role model. Konnikova, who writes the Literally Psyched blog for ScientificAmerican.com, examines Holmes's uncanny skills of deduction through the lens of modern psychology and neuroscience. In the process, Holmes emerges not only as a proponent of the scientific method but also, more surprisingly, as a practitioner of mindfulness. To think like Holmes is to be unfailingly objective and always present in the moment.

Konnikova mines Holmes's adventures for examples of the detective explicating psychological concepts established long after his time. Here is Holmes scolding Watson, when charmed by a comely female client, for succumbing to correspondence bias, the tendency to interpret behavior through someone's personality. There is Holmes explaining omission neglect, the tendency to ignore missing information, when he notes that a dog's silence can be as telling as its bark (for Holmes, this meant the dog knew the intruder). Amid tough cases, Holmes's pipe smoking, violin playing and trips to the symphony are not just quirks—they are his way of stimulating the creative process through mental and physical distance.

Scientifically, Konnikova does not cover any ground not already canvassed by other pop psychology books, which often do so in more depth. The novelty of Mastermind—a book that barely rises above its origins as blog posts—is in introducing these same ideas through the language and allegory of Conan Doyle's stories. Fast, impulsive thinking becomes the “Watson system”; slower, rational thinking the “Holmes system”; and the human mind is dubbed the “brain attic,” a phrase coined by Holmes. These devices might tickle the Holmes fan but can be frustrating for a reader more interested in the science behind the extended metaphors.

Holmes's genius lies not only in an awareness of the common pitfalls in human thinking but also in his ability to overcome these weaknesses in himself. He achieved the latter through a lifetime of practice, Konnikova says—and that is the summation of her book's advice. Although Mastermind promises to teach you how to think like Holmes, it succeeds mostly in enumerating the many ways we behave like Watson. It's too hard, even inhuman, to go through life thinking like Holmes.


This article was originally published with the title Elementary Mind-Set.



Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. dubina 04:00 PM 3/27/13

    Preamble:

    Holmes's genius lies not only in an awareness of the common pitfalls in human thinking but also in his ability to overcome these weaknesses in himself. He achieved the latter through a lifetime of practice, Konnikova says—and that is the summation of her book's advice. Although Mastermind promises to teach you how to think like Holmes, it succeeds mostly in enumerating the many ways we behave like Watson. It's too hard, even inhuman, to go through life thinking like Holmes.

    "Elementary", of course, is also a CBS television series that features Johnny Lee Miller as Sherlock Holmes, Lucy Liu as Joan Watson, set in contemporary New York City rather than London circa 1880 to 1914.

    The CBS Holmes is written to be a kind of good psychopath. Watson is not his sidekick so much as his apprentice. It might seem to some that "It's too hard, even inhuman, to go through life thinking like Holmes," but let the record show "Elementary" is instructive by design and adored by many. We are not quite privy to Holmes' interior cognitive processes, but we are given to see ample evidence of them. What we see is a harbinger of more interesting things to come.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. bucketofsquid 06:00 PM 4/1/13

    A fictional detective is only as good as the writer. Arthur Conan Doyle may have had what I consider a very "Watsonian" view of the world but somewhere lurking in his mind the real Sherlock Holmes lived with his very inhuman "Holmesian" thought processes.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

MIND Reviews: Mastermind: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X