Cover Image: May 2011 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

MIND Reviews: SciCafe














Share on Tumblr



Image: R. Mickens American Museum of Natural History

SciCafe
American Museum of Natural History
Free admission, www.amnh.org/SciCafe

It’s 7 P.M. in the Gottesman Hall of Planet Earth at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan and almost time for the monthly SciCafe. Tonight’s topic: the effects that illegal drugs such as methamphetamine and cocaine have on the brain.

The speaker is Columbia University psychologist Carl Hart. After a short introduction, Hart hits the audience with a doozy. “What many of us have been told is that drugs destroy brain cells,” he pronounces. “But the dose that’s required to do that is so excessive, we don’t usually see it.” In other words, he says, the doses of meth and cocaine that most drug abusers take are not enough to harm the brain.

To bolster his point, Hart mentions a famous 2004 study in the Journal of Neuroscience that found that the volumes of the brain’s limbic lobes and hippocampi—regions responsible for emotion, behavior and memory—in chronic meth users were 11 and 8 percent smaller, respectively, than in people who did not use drugs. At the time, the New York Times explained this result as “a forest fire of brain damage,” but Hart counters this argument, stating that “the notion that these folks exhibit brain deficits or cognitive impairment is simply not supported by the weight of the evidence.” Changes in brain volume are not necessarily indicative of cognitive impairment, he adds. In fact, studies have consistently shown the doses of methamphetamine drug users take boost cognitive function, not the other way around.

Hart’s point is provocative, but that, he says, is entirely the point: “One of the instructions I was given when I accepted this invitation was, ‘Don’t bore people.’ ”


Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jtdwyer 10:51 AM 4/22/11

    While not boring, the author's statement:
    "In fact, studies have consistently shown the doses of methamphetamine drug users take boost cognitive function, not the other way around" seems to stretch the point.

    Has the author ever tried to carry on a coherent conversation with someone who's been on a meth binge? The enhancement aspect tends to subside after a couple of days... I prefer that my bus driver leave the performance enhancement stuff alone.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

MIND Reviews: SciCafe: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X