Brain New World: The Brain Supremacy: Notes from the Frontiers of Neuroscience
by Kathleen Taylor
Oxford University Press, 2012 ($29.95)

What if our thoughts could be plumbed by a brain scanner and memories manipulated with the flip of a genetic switch? Neuroscientist Taylor believes these science fiction–like scenarios could become reality because new technologies may soon allow unprecedented access to our brains.

Taylor begins The Brain Supremacy by contemplating a future in which we can decipher others' private emotions and ideas as well as sculpt designer minds. Scientists can already decode single words and reconstruct mental images using functional MRI. We also tinker with brain activity on a daily basis by consuming mood-altering chemicals, such as caffeine and alcohol. More targeted neural enhancements, which might involve inserting new genes or modifying existing ones, could improve not only our cognition but also our personality, fashioning more law-abiding citizens or devoted spouses.

The intended appeal of The Brain Supremacy may be its future-focused musings, but this is the weakest part of the book. Though compelling in theory, Taylor's predictions fall flat because, as she admits, we are nowhere close to creating the tools or understanding the brain sufficiently to probe it in such depth. For instance, her critiques of fMRI make it clear that the technology is not equipped for full-fledged mind reading; it is too slow to catch moment-to-moment neural activity, and its data are often too crude to interpret.

Taylor's richest material lies in her explanations of what neuroscience can do now. She crafts an elegant guidebook on current technologies and methods for studying the brain, comparing the capabilities of different approaches and conveying the tedium of most day-to-day science. She describes her early research using rats to model activity in a part of the brain that processes touch. Her team inserted electrodes into the rats' brains and injected chemicals to observe how sensory receptors responded, then extracted the brains for analysis. The ability to probe and tinker with a brain in this way is invaluable in our search for knowledge.

Taylor does touch on research that could lay the foundation for more invasive and comprehensive cognitive enhancements. For instance, she reveals how investigators engineered mice to have a specific number of serotonin receptors, which are located in various brain regions and have been shown to affect the success of antidepressants. Mice with fewer receptors responded to Prozac, whereas those with many did not, supporting the hypothesis that simple genetic differences might explain why a drug works in some people and fails in others. This research showcases our potential to tailor drugs to an individual or tweak genes to make treatments more effective.

This comprehensive guide to the powers and limitations of neuroscience has much to offer, whether one agrees or disagrees with Taylor's predictions. Her goal is to intrigue and motivate further investigation, and she succeeds on that front.

This article was originally published with the title Brain New World.

4 Comments

1. 1. krohleder 03:57 PM 3/8/13

   "More targeted neural enhancements, which might involve inserting new genes or modifying existing ones, could improve not only our cognition but also our personality, fashioning more law-abiding citizens or devoted spouses." - That is one of the most disturbing sentences I have read in awhile.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. Rev.Corvette 04:25 PM 3/8/13

   Going from disturbing directly to horrifying...while we are at it, someone of less noble ambition may try fashioning more easily trained soldiers or devoted slaves? Maybe it is so difficult to achieve these abilities because mankind (and women-kind of course) is not capable of administering the power you describe. I do not believe in such a thing as "bad science", but this comes close.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. Y V Chawla 11:46 PM 3/13/13

   Mind escapes absorbing the disliked (unpleasant) situation, explains away by complaining, blaming others, feeling guilty, blaming fate, I will be successful in future and so on.Any disliked situation is psychological discomfort only, if it is not immediate physical danger.If this escape is just noticed, the whole energy is concentrated.Brain touches a new dimension.
   https://sites.google.com/site/yvchawla/fusion-3

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. drusmama in reply to krohleder 03:42 PM 3/25/13

   "More targeted neural enhancements, which might involve inserting new genes or modifying existing ones, could improve not only our cognition but also our personality, fashioning more law-abiding citizens or devoted spouses." I agree it is disturbing upon first glance --- but haven't we already left the gate --- the quote starts with the adjective "more." So what is new in this practice? How many people do you know that already take behavior and mood altering drugs --- those drugs change brain and body chemistry --- earth organisms are equipped with epigenetic programs that allow for genetic modification throughout the life of the organism --- and whether through drugs,behavior modification, or genetic manipulation we change the genetic make-up of our species --- would we be so quick to take an aghast step back if we were talking about altering a gene to eliminate diabetes --- keeping in mind the fact of diabetes has measurable behavioral and personality consequences. Let's move forward with caution but but also surety. What we are worried about has already occurred, and we are still here to address the ever-emerging challenge of our wild human experience.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this