Cover Image: November 2009 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Beyond North and South: Evidence for Magnetic Monopoles

A sighting, of sorts, of separate north-south magnetic poles 















Share on Tumblr

“I’m not trying to put down the experiment or the work in any way,” says Milton, noting that the findings are important in condensed-matter physics. But “they’re not important from a fundamental point of view.”

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Monopole Position."



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. joeldooris 11:18 AM 11/6/09

    Humm, maybe the fields in the 'monopoles' are still there, just out of 'phase' with the rest of the other fields. Thus why you have them in pairs.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. slaven41 12:32 PM 11/6/09

    The divergence of B is still zero. Nothing has changed. It's interesting though.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. gelunelu 06:30 PM 11/6/09

    Real Monopoles do exist, (only if some humans (provided they have the facility, to experiment, which would be costly), the ability to concentrate and be of solemn nature, to a solemn civilization).
    Nevertheless, Mother Nature, the creation only allows inventions of destructions to a world of humans, with such intelligent behaviour.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Quinn the Eskimo 12:42 AM 11/7/09

    Monopoles *do* exist!

    algore is one of them. Listen to him talk. Babbles about CO2 and keeps a mansion. Rails about Global Warming (in the face of the 3rd coldest October on record) and flies exclusively in private jets.

    algore stands to profit handsomely from the $9 Trillion the Greenies want to spend on fixing--something.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. billhunter 12:35 PM 11/8/09

    It always amazes me how someone can read a very interesting article like this, and reply not with well thought out comments about the advancement of science, but rather a completely unrelated political rant full of wild and false assertions. Our friend Quinn has plainly shown how helpless this quest of educating the masses really is. Why do scientists struggle every day trying to ascertain the truths of the natural world, when the beneficiaries of the struggle are ignoramuses devoid of knowledge and wonder, who get there scientific opinions from FOX news.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. kasuleconcepter@yahoo.com 10:31 AM 11/14/09

    If these is true, or later provided true.It will break the backbone of physics and cosmology as we know it. I have always thought that for example that not everything in the distant universe was physically at that position as we saw it,Knowing that diffraction and reflection can actually be a possibility that would falsfy some of our observation ,if magnetic monopoles are proved then depending on the distribution of matter that has those properties far in distant universe can introduce that, causing a boundary were mirroring can occur thus multiplication effect, is a possibility, anther is objects seem to move faster when looked after mirroring has occurred, let no one take it seriously for non has been proved yet but its worth thinking about.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Beyond North and South: Evidence for Magnetic Monopoles: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X