Mysterious Radiation Burst Recorded in Tree Rings

Spike in carbon-14 levels indicates a massive cosmic event -- but supernovae and solar flares ruled out.


Nature













Share on Tumblr

By of Richard A. Lovett of Nature magazine

Just over 1,200 years ago, the planet was hit by an extremely intense burst of high-energy radiation of unknown cause, scientists studying tree-ring data have found.

The radiation burst, which seems to have hit between AD 774 and AD 775, was detected by looking at the amounts of the radioactive isotope carbon-14 in tree rings that formed during the AD 775 growing season in the Northern Hemisphere. The increase in C-14 levels is so clear that the scientists, led by Fusa Miyake, a cosmic-ray physicist from Nagoya University in Japan, conclude that the atmospheric level of C-14 must have jumped by 1.2 percent over the course of no longer than a year, about 20 times more than the normal rate of variation. Their study was published online June 3 in Nature.

"The work looks pretty solid," says Daniel Baker, a space physicist at the University of Colorado's Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics in Boulder, Colo. "Some very energetic event occurred in about AD 775."

Exactly what that event was, however, is more difficult to determine.

The C-14 isotope is formed when highly energetic radiation from outer space hits atoms in the upper atmosphere, producing neutrons. These collide with nitrogen-14, which then decays to C-14. (The fact that this is always happening because of background radiation is what produces a continuous source of C-14 for radiocarbon dating.)

Cosmic puzzle

The only known events that can produce a C-14 spike are floods of γ-rays from supernova explosions or proton storms from giant solar flares. But neither seems likely, Miyake says, because each should have been large enough to have had other effects that would have been observed at the time.

A massive supernova, for example, should have been bright enough to produce a "new" star visible even in the daytime, as was the case for two known supernovae in AD 1006 and AD 1054. Such an explosion would have needed to be brighter than either of these, Miyake says, because those events were not large enough to leave traces in the C-14 record.

It is possible, he says, that the proposed event might have occurred in the far southern skies, where astronomers of the era wouldn't have seen it. But still, he says, if it did happen, today's X-ray and radio astronomers should have found signs of a "tremendously bright" remnant of the explosion.

As for solar flares, he says, anything that could have produced the required amount of super-high-energy protons would have vastly exceeded the most intense solar outburst ever recorded. There should have been a historical record of extraordinary auroras--not to mention that such a gigantic flare would probably have destroyed the ozone layer, with devastating ecological consequences.

Baker, however, thinks that Miyake's team may have been too quick to rule out a solar flare. Flares are sometimes associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs)--huge eruptions of magnetically charged plasma from the Sun's atmosphere that send streams of charged particles towards Earth. It might be possible, he says, for CMEs to be accompanied by conditions in which an unusual number of protons are accelerated to super-high energies, even without the flare itself being "ridiculously strong."

"We know much more these days about how important proton acceleration is at the shock fronts that precede CME structures as they propagate towards Earth," Baker says. "I would like to think about whether a strong CME moving directly towards Earth could have produced the intense proton population that impacted Earth's atmosphere."

"It would be fascinating," Baker adds, "if there were some record in China or in the Middle East that reported powerful aurora or some other such event" around the same time as the observed C-14 increase.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on June 3, 2012.


Nature

9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. And Then What? 08:18 PM 6/4/12

    Perhaps the collapse of an enormous Dark Matter object into a Black Hole would be one possibility????

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Mattuk 04:12 AM 6/5/12

    774AD rang a bell and so I looked up the entry for the Anglo Saxon Chronicle for that year:

    "A.D. 774. This year the Northumbrians banished their king, Alfred, from York at Easter-tide; and chose Ethelred, the son of Mull, for their lord, who reigned four winters. This year also appeared in the heavens a red crucifix, after sunset; the Mercians and the men of Kent fought at Otford; and wonderful serpents were seen in the land of the South-Saxons."

    Could the celestial crucifix be a supernova?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. fredgarvin in reply to Mattuk 05:35 PM 6/5/12

    that was real sharp.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Xplorer 02:30 AM 6/8/12

    Everyone is quick in branding it as a 'Cosmic Puzzle' in the process forgetting that the Earth is part of the same Cosmos. Is there a possibility or likelihood of processes taking place within the Earth that might have resulted in the observed enhancement in C-14. Or is it ruled out totally. How geographically local is the effect? Even the location of the observations is not mentioned.And trees make one ring a year - this means the observations refer to one data point in a long series. Could it be just an erroneous outlier!!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. doneck 05:58 PM 6/8/12

    "Perhaps the collapse of an enormous Dark Matter object into a Black Hole would be one possibility????"

    No, an impossibility.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. timbosta 02:13 AM 6/9/12

    Too strong to have been caused by anything but a supernova that was nearby and left a trace, and too weak to cause any kind of extinction event - Some kind of short-lived Local Event, then? Pre -telescopes, so nothing definitive in the record. I don't remember anything being said about radiation after Tunguska, so maybe not an atmospheric comet burst. Mattuk's Anglo Saxon Chronicle soumds good; which of the solar planets appeared in the sky after sunset over England at that time? should be possible to trace it back. Was it Jupiter? Was it maybe the event which gave rise to the Great Red Spot? An asteroid impact with Jupiter? A Moon's orbit finally decaying?
    Sorry..Just idly speculating....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. bucove 02:48 PM 6/9/12

    They have not considered the possibility of an earthly and natural Oklo-style event?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Quinn the Eskimo 09:41 PM 6/17/12

    The cave bear was changing the batteries in his Nikon Digital Camera when he dropped one and it exploded! See? No super natural galactic event required. Simple.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. jtdwyer in reply to Mattuk 09:02 PM 6/28/12

    Outstanding discovery!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Mysterious Radiation Burst Recorded in Tree Rings

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X