
WEIGHTY MATTERS: The diagonal beam in this image can detect the presence of single molecules and determine their mass.
Image: Caltech/Scott Kelber and Michael Roukes
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
Dieters and exercise buffs might feel better about their progress if they tracked their weight loss in daltons. Even a short jog can help you shed a few septillion daltons, a unit of mass often used in biochemistry that is equivalent to the atomic mass unit. (Of course, no weight-conscious individual would want to know their full weight in this unit—the average American male weighs approximately 5 X 1028 daltons.)
Even the megadalton, or one million daltons, is a tiny unit of measure—a gold particle five nanometers across weighs in at just a few megadaltons. (One nanometer is a billionth of a meter.) But researchers at the California Institute of Technology and CEA–Leti, a government-funded research organization in Grenoble, France, have built a scale that weighs single objects even lighter than a megadalton, including nanoparticles and human antibody molecules. The device is the first of its kind to determine the masses of individual molecules and nanoparticles in real time, the researchers reported in a study published online August 26 in Nature Nanotechnology. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)
The heart of the device is a nanoelectromechanical resonator—a tiny beam of silicon vibrating at two tones simultaneously. "It's like vibrating a guitar string at the fundamental and a harmonic," says study co-author Michael Roukes, a Caltech physicist. "We're continuously strumming it with an electrostatic excitation." The beam runs diagonally across the photo (above); it measures 10 microns long and 300 nanometers wide. (A micron is one millionth of a meter.)
Tiny arms connecting the ends of the beam to the rest of the device convert the resonator's vibrations into an electrical signal via a phenomenon known as the piezoresistive effect. "The smallest pieces there are flexed slightly, and when they're flexed their resistance changes," Roukes says. "And so we can read out the motion as a change in resistance." A single molecule landing on the beam shifts the frequency of the two tones downward, and from the accompanying change in resistance the researchers can deduce both the mass of the particle and where it landed along the beam.
The device's sensitivity to single molecules allowed the researchers to perform mass spectroscopy—identifying the various particles in a mixture by their masses—on collections of gold nanoparticles five and 10 nanometers in diameter, as well as on the antibody molecule immunoglobulin M, which weighs just under one megadalton. (The natural molecules proved much more consistent in their construction than did the man-made nanoparticles, whose masses fluctuated by a factor of five or so from particle to particle.)
Roukes notes that past resonators were capable of measuring molecular masses, but only after hundreds of identical molecules had been deposited onto the beam. "We couldn't actually know molecule by molecule what their mass was," he says. The new, more sensitive version should allow researchers to perform mass spectroscopy to identify the various particles within a mixed sample. For instance, researchers could analyze a biological specimen to look for a telltale biomarker with a known mass. "If we can do it one by one, now we can start looking at arbitrarily complex mixtures of different things,” he says.




See what we're tweeting about


2 Comments
Add CommentSo did it mention specifically what size of molecules it can measure, and with what accuracy? Can it for instance tell if CO2 has C12 or C14?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIn talking about very large or small things, instead of prefixes, shouldn't we be using something like "Ex", meaning 10 to the x power? I'd prefer one that uses "Tx", meaning 1000 to the x power.
Is it really possible to measure the mass of a photon as 1.659x10^-54 gm ? With this help of this mass it is possible to classify all from the particle to the Universe, and it is written in the book Complete Unified Theory ( page- 424, 1998) --- the book is available in few libraries only, You may get the book from:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this1. SB Berlin PK. Search Short List-[ Translate ], Andy Evans. Berlin [u.a] : Springer, 2000. Buch, Complete unified theory / Nirmalendu Das. 1. ed. Guwahati [u.a.] : Bani Prokash, 1998.
2. National Library, Kolkata, Government of India, Ministry of Culture. Call No. E 530.142 D26.
And in some places.
Nirmalendu Das.
Email: nirmalgopa@gmail.com
Dated: 02-09-2012