"New" Antarctica Bacteria Now Said to Only Be Contaminant

The episode underscores the role that scientific peer review should play in vetting discovery claims


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

Confirming that any possible signature of life is not a contaminant is complicated, to say the least.

There's a strict protocol the Americans strive to follow in Antarctica, said Doran, who is familiar with the practices of the U.S. Whillans Ice Stream Subglacial Access Research Drilling project (WISSARD) team that worked this year at Antarctica's Lake Whillans.

Doran could not speak specifically to the Russians, but said the American work demonstrates a good methodology.

In WISSARD's case, it involves sterilizing all the equipment with hydrogen peroxide gel or a similar product, then hermetically sealing them in bags for shipment. Scientists on-site sterilize the water in the drill system through several steps that include filters and life-killing ultraviolet radiation.

As the drill progresses through the ice, the scientists monitor cell counts to make sure there are no unexplained jumps.

WISSARD recently announced life findings of its own, but Doran was equally skeptical of that until a paper comes out confirming the work. [Gallery: Finding Life in a Buried Antarctic Lake]

To the WISSARD announcement, Doran said, "I understand how it happened. There are embedded reporters in the field with them. They are sitting around the dinner table together, and drinking Scotch together, and the reporters are right there [when scientists say] 'Our cell counts are way up when we've gone into the lake water.'"

"Of course that gets reported, but without the peer review literature, it's still a violation of how the standard things are done," Doran said.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TechMediaNetwork

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. GabrielleRab 02:41 PM 3/12/13

    Thank you for this clear and informative piece. I am also making a stand against over-hyped science journalism over at The Incubator. There have been countless examples of sensationalist press releases spurring false expectations and disappointment, especially on the topic of new or "alien" life. Please check out my piece on hype vs enthusiasm in science reporting and let me know what you think: http://incubator.rockefeller.edu/?p=559

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jh443 04:49 PM 3/12/13

    Lovely. This makes me wonder whether Lake Ellsworth is now contaminated.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jh443 04:50 PM 3/12/13

    Er, Vostok that is.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. G. Karst 12:45 PM 3/13/13

    Never, never, never base conclusions on research "first" reports. They haven't yet been scrutinized by non-invested peers, and is how we were all captured, by the exaggerated first reports, from the climate communities CO2 rampage. GK

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

"New" Antarctica Bacteria Now Said to Only Be Contaminant

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X