Cover Image: July 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Could Our Own Proteins Be Used to Help Us Fight Cancer? [Preview]

Protective heat shock proteins present in every cell have long been known to counteract stress. Newly recognized roles in cancer and immunity make them potential therapeutic allies















Share on Tumblr



HEAT SHOCK PROTEINS are cellular chaperones, protecting the integrity of proteins by helping them to take and keep the proper shape, to get to the right places and to avoid unwanted interactions. Image: Jeff Johnson, Hybrid Medical Animation

In Brief

  • Guardian proteins, found in all forms of life, keep a wide variety of cellular processes running smoothly.
  • Through their diverse interactions, these proteins pick up telltale “fingerprints” of each cell’s contents, which has allowed them to evolve a critical role in immune responses to cancer or pathogens.
  • Therapies that take advantage of these proteins include inhibitors and enhancers of their various natural functions.

In 1962 someone at the Genetics Institute in Pavia, Italy, turned up the temperature in an incubator holding fruit flies. When Ferruccio Ritossa, then a young geneticist, examined the cells of these “heat shocked” flies, he noticed that their chromosomes had puffed up at discrete locations. The puffy appearance was a known sign that genes were being activated in those regions to give rise to their encoded proteins, so those sites of activity became known as the heat shock loci.

The effect was reproducible but initially considered to be unique to the fruit fly. It took another 15 years before the proteins generated when these chromosome puffs appear were detected in mammals and other forms of life. In what is certainly among the most absorbing stories in contemporary biology, heat shock proteins (HSPs) have since been recognized as occupying a central role in all life—not just at the level of cells but of organisms and whole populations.


Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jaramilr 05:00 PM 7/17/08

    This is very interesting. I have a few questions about the implications of this research:

    1) An article in SciAm a few months ago discussed the fact that inflammation helped cancer thrive. Is this related in any way to the finding that HSPs help cells survive heat shock? Could the immune response to cancer cells be inhibited by inflammation due to insufficient amount of HSPs in normal cells? Does the inflammation promote HSP production in either normal or cancerous cells?

    2) If HSPs can boost immune response to specific pathogens, could suppressing HSPs be used to suppress allergies by controlling immune response to specific allergens?

    3) One of the captions in the magazine version of this article says that exercise boosts the immune system in part because increased body temperature causes an increase in HSP production. I have allergy induced asthma that can also be induced by exercise. Is it possible that by increasing immune response via exercise, sensitivity to airborne allergens increases as well?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Fabrice LOTY 05:36 AM 7/24/08

    The article is actually interesting, just that evolutionism desperate condition elicits overreaction from some core scientists, as they try to defend it by all means, thus seeing evolution everywhere.
    Let us now elaborate: if HSPs are released under stressful conditions, let us not forget the original cell is merely coping. The loss of HSPs means significant loss of materials within the cell, therefore significant loss of life. According to the law of adaptation with subsequent loss of life (by the IDer Fabrice LOTY), the real issue is about knowing weather the organism will still hold enough life within itself for optimal functioning at the time when natural selection purports to produce a new form of life. For each adaptation is accompanied with subsequent loss of life material. Moreover, the following statement, They have shown that when HSP90 functioning was suppressed in fruit flies, a large number of pre-existing genetic mutations were unmasked, has just nothing to do with an imaginary buffering effect. We instead have the final proof that HSPs action rules out the possibility of evolution. The said large number of pre-existing genetic mutations is logically proportional to a corresponding large number of pre-existing HSPs, to enable effective control of deleterious effects. It follows the roughly uniform number of HPSs in living organisms is an output indicating the correlated limited number of latent genetic mutations.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. mita in reply to jaramilr 06:07 AM 2/22/09

    As far as i am aware, HSP 90 HELPS to mask mutations (Which are quite rampant in cancerous cells). Blocking HSP 90 helps to control the cancer (HSP inhiboitors like Geldanamycin, Macrolide class could be used)
    Whereas extracting the HSP 70 class of family from cancerous cells (Which obviously holds the antigenic determinants) and injecting them sub-cutaneously after purification activates the APCs against those anigens and MAY HELP controlling cancer..
    Refer to the paper by Whitesell and Susan lindquist

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Could Our Own Proteins Be Used to Help Us Fight Cancer?: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X