Tests Find More Than 200 Chemicals in Newborn Umbilical Cord Blood

Study commissioned by environmental group finds high levels of chemicals in U.S. minority infants














Share on Tumblr

"These results are alarming for their implications of health impacts on children," Trasande said.

Another challenge facing chemical regulators is understanding how the different chemicals interact together, which is particularly significant given the number of chemicals found in people.

"What we're finding are complex mixtures of chemicals that sometimes have similar toxicities," Jacobs said. "There's an increased recognition that mixtures are a problem. ... It's very difficult to evaluate, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. We should also try to decrease the toxicity of individual chemicals."

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500


9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. candide 04:42 PM 12/2/09

    Bad news for humans...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Rob Hooft 04:57 PM 12/2/09

    Please avoid the use of the word "chemical" for "substance that is unlikely to be of biological origin". I hope umbilical cord blood actually contains tens of thousands of different chemicals, not only two hundred. Even though it can be argued that all compounds are potentially toxic, it is still a bad habit to use "chemical" and "non-natural toxic substance" as synonyms.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. JosephVos 04:31 AM 12/5/09

    I would love to hear from you what chemicals you found and how we can avoid getting these chemicals into the umbilical cord.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. JosephVos 04:32 AM 12/5/09

    We would love to hear from you which chemical compounds you found and how we could avoid getting these compounds into the umbilical cord.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. nank 10:27 AM 12/9/09

    They may not all be chemicals, however that is what the researchers call them.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Americord 03:49 AM 9/1/11

    Hello ! I work for a cord blood bank and can give you the facts behind the over-promotion. See http://cordadvantage.com/cord-blood-blog/2011/5-straight-facts-about-cord-blood-viacord-viacell-and-cord-blood-registry-wont-tell-you/ to find 5 Straight Facts About Cord Blood ViaCord / ViaCell and Cord Blood Registry Won’t Tell You.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Healthy living in reply to JosephVos 06:32 PM 9/4/12

    JosephVos ~ I work with Shaklee, I would love to give you information on toxins and how to avoid them. email me at mmacpetrie0@gmail.com and I can give you more information.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Healthy living in reply to JosephVos 06:32 PM 9/4/12

    JosephVos ~ I work with Shaklee, I would love to give you information on toxins and how to avoid them. email me at mmacpetrie0@gmail.com and I can give you more information.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Tamara Hussey in reply to Rob Hooft 01:26 PM 2/23/13

    Rob Hooft when they say 200 chemicals, they indeed mean toxic, non organically naturally occurring chemicals.These are man made chemicals which are known "toxins" to humans. That means that these "200 chemicals" are indeed the sort to have a known impact on human life and health.

    You should google "Articles on hormone disruptors" before you get too upset about the suggested findings and while it's nice and all that the writer of this article is being "Politically Correct" in it's closing statement, "less harmful" is not enough, period. When it comes to sustainable, longterm human existence, which is highly questionable with all of today's new, man-made toxins (in the name of making money and "progress"), NON toxic, as in NOT toxic in the LEAST is the ONLY acceptible alternative. Less toxic is NOT EVER going to be okay with me, nor my future children and grandchildren, thank you.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Tests Find More Than 200 Chemicals in Newborn Umbilical Cord Blood

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X