No "Death Star" for U.S. Military, White House Says

The U.S. government refuses to spend 85 quadrillion taxpayer dollars on a Death Star, based on a fictional space station in the movie Star Wars, saying the project's fatal flaws make it susceptible to attacks by one-man starships


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

"We don't have a Death Star, but we do have floating robot assistants on the space station, a President who knows his way around a light saber and advanced (marshmallow) cannon, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is supporting research on building Luke's [robotic] arm, floating droids, and quadruped walkers," Shawcross wrote.

"We are living in the future!" Shawcross wrote. "Enjoy it. Or better yet, help build it by pursuing a career in a science, technology, engineering or math-related field."

The Administration and NASA have both been working to spur interest in science, math, engineering and technology among students.

"If you do pursue a career in a science, technology, engineering or math-related field, the Force will be with us!" Shawcross concluded. "Remember, the Death Star's power to destroy a planet, or even a whole star system, is insignificant next to the power of the Force."

With the Death Star officially the table, there is another science fiction spaceship petition that could draw a White House response.

Last month, an engineer writing as BTE Dan launched a petition to build a real-life Starship Enterprise from the "Star Trek" TV series. So far, 5,973 have signed the petition, so it still has a ways to go to prompt a White House response. The petition's deadline is January 21.

For Shawcross's full response to the Death Star response, visit: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/response/isnt-petition-response-youre-looking

Copyright 2013 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TechMediaNetwork

8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. diducthat 09:02 AM 1/16/13

    Does the government not have any serious work to do? I could suggest a couple of important issues that they could be occupying their time with, rather than spending public money replying to time wasters.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. levet1066 10:21 AM 1/16/13

    Lighten up, the government is required by law to respond to such petitions once the number of people signing it hits 25,000. The complete responce in posted on Wireds' site and is actually pretty funny. It was in my view an appopriat responce to a silly petition

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. edwardwstanley@hotmail.com 07:07 PM 1/16/13

    My counter proposal I think is a reasonable alternative.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/bring-back-firefly/wH699Xx4

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. PatrickR 03:19 PM 1/17/13

    What an ignorant waste of time to even have a debate or give serious consideration to such a thing. We spend enough money creating Atom-Bombs,Cobalt-Bombs,Hydrogen-Bombs,Neutron-Bombs and lord knows what else. Can't we get away from weapons of mass destruction and start spending money on life instead of death.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Wayne Williamson 06:48 PM 1/17/13

    Very much enjoyed this one....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. greenhome123 10:14 PM 1/17/13

    While the Death Star idea is funny, it made me think of something we probably should be focusing more on which which is asteroid/comet impact avoidance.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Oldineluctable 05:52 PM 1/18/13

    BO is desperate to keep America weak and behind. His plan is to do as much damage to the military and the economy as possible. HOw unuasua for an American to deliberatley hurt America as BO has done.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Wayne Williamson 05:56 PM 1/18/13

    @7 Oldineluctable...what a bunch of crap...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

No "Death Star" for U.S. Military, White House Says

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X