 assumes power in North Korea, he inherits an arsenal of nuclear weapons that his father, Kim Jong-il, helped create.){kind=spacer}
INHERITED ARSENAL: As Kim Jong-un (right) assumes power in North Korea, he inherits an arsenal of nuclear weapons that his father, Kim Jong-il, helped create.
Image: Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
As the body of North Korea's "dear leader" Kim Jong-il lies in state at his palace in Pyongyang, his youngest son Kim Jong-un takes control of the country's nuclear weapons program. Despite being named Kim's successor in 2009, Kim Jong-un remains a bit of a mystery to the West. One unanswered question: How much power does the younger Kim wield over the country's military?
To better understand what the succession of power in North Korea means for its nuclear program, Scientific American spoke with Frank von Hippel, a professor at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and co-founder of the school's Program on Science and Global Security. Von Hippel, a former assistant director for national security in the White House Office of Science and Technology during the Clinton administration, discusses new evidence of North Korea's nuclear capabilities, the possibility of U.S.-orchestrated regime change, and the amount of plutonium needed to ruin your day.
[An edited transcript of the interview follows.]
How has the nuclear threat out of North Korea changed with the death of Kim Jong-il?
I don't think you would see a nuclear weapon used out of the blue by North Korea. Still, it's hard to tell. There have been incidents in the past few years leading up to Kim's death that have provoked South Korea in particular. Any transition is a time of some instability and that instability might lead to crazy things happening.
What impact will the succession of Kim Jong-un have on the direction the country takes?
There's been a lot of talk for a long time about the North Korean regime collapsing. But the Chinese don't want North Korea to collapse because they are concerned about South Korea absorbing North Korea and then, in effect, the U.S. military having a position on the Chinese border. They see North Korea as a buffer state. But North Korea's direction really depends on their [Korea's own] military and whether they will support the succession of Kim's son.
There have been incidents in the past couple of years—the sinking of the South Korean destroyer and the shelling of an island contested between the two counties—attributed to Kim Jong-un as a way of showing that he's not scared of South Korea and that he's leadership material.*
There's no indication that Kim Jong-un has the background or education (except for a fairly short period of time in Switzerland) to be the one to open up North Korea and bring them in from the cold the way [Mikhail] Gorbachev did for the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. And there's also a question of whether the military would let him do that even if he wanted to. At this point, he's probably not an absolute leader. He's a leader only as long as long as he leads in the direction that the military wants to be led.
In your January 2010 Scientific American article "Time to Ban Production of Nuclear Weapons Material" you write that India, Pakistan and North Korea are increasing their weapon stockpiles. How do we know about the current state of North Korea's nuclear weapons capabilities?
A year ago, Siegfried Hecker [co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation [CISAC] at Stanford's Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies] returned from North Korea with some CISAC colleagues. During their stay in North Korea, they were shown a uranium-enrichment facility. They had expected to see an outdated facility based on equipment and designs that were at least 60 years old. Instead, they were surprised by the small, ultramodern, industrial-scale enrichment facility with 2,000 centrifuges. This is comparable to what Iran has. No one has questioned Sig Hecker's findings.
*Shortly after Kim Jong-un was named Kim Jong-il's successor, North Korea conducted a nuclear test large enough to cause a magnitude 4.7 seismic event in that country. Then in March 2010 a North Korean torpedo sank a South Korean navy ship, killing 46 sailors. Months later, North Korea fired about 200 artillery shells at Yeonpyeong, a South Korean island near a disputed maritime border, killing four people. Most recently, South Korea has accused the North of test firing a short-range missile shortly before the announcement of Kim Jong-il's death.
Rights & Permissions
See what we're tweeting about
8 Comments
Add CommentCTRL-F: as long as long
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this"Actually there's a lot of anxiety about both of them, and there's a concern with regard to North Korea that South Korea and perhaps even Japan might get so worried that they feel they need their nuclear weapons."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisCome on guys. This is "Scientific" American. Proof read :P
I was watching a video on how some people were crying for the death of this Dictator (impressive are we going to cry if our politicians die I dont think so)...anyway here in México we wouldnt. I think the death of a Dictator is a new transition to better relations, his son is young and seems to have an open mind, even if he was trained for just one year in the position. People in north Korea did consider did past dictator as "divine" so there is a lot of religious stuff involved and idealization of this person. I think USA should be aware from South Korea and becareful, I was reading they tried to change plutonioum for food and they did agree so thats a positive sign. We need to becareful with Venezuela and Russia those countries are trying to invade USA and there are rumors that in México where I live there is Hezzbollah and Iranian groups doing some damage to our society -as we all know-.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisNuclear weapons are not toys and the Pentagon should be very carefull on those communist countries where freedom of speech is limited and so is freedom to be different or to behave differently, because the prize for a communist regime is controll is manipulation, etc.
I see a better future...greetings
For a start they do not have a missile that can Carrie the nuclear bomb.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisTeaepoodong 1 can not carry a nuclear bomb, the taepodong 2 does not work yet. it has failed in lots of test.
The only problem is the cannon fire. they can hit sk city and would make massive damage.
The only thing they could do for that, is put up 1 billion dollars worth of cheap $SK made blimps / balloons, that would see small damage from the cannon fire aimed to sk main city in range.
It would take hours to take out most of there cannons, there for the blimps would see small or no damage on the main city.
NK needs to be taken out, before that young psychopath that will go for it, get a missile that can work or hit a target in a city size are. there missiles are very inaccurate if they even works at all.
I know that NK's cannon weapons fire a round, then go back under ground. that would not be a problem because even if you did not use bunker buster bomb, (that you should not need to because they are not that deep under ground), you would drop it on the entry and that would blow up the opening and leave it trapped under ground.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisClinton is a full for letting them get nuclear weapons. at least they will not let Iran after that.
I would like to see a devise made like this.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisBombs that blow up in the air & magnetize the cannons round made metal. the cannon metal rounds will then fly near the city where a massive like magnet electronic field will be under ground, and will pull them down to the ground before they can hit the city.
Well even if A jet fighter or missile had metal, components, chip, parts, or the seat belt, or the guns on them was made of metal, it will pull the jet fighter to the ground or severely damage the craft by ripping it out.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWell even if A jet fighter or missile had metal, components, chip, parts, or the seat belt, or the guns on them was made of metal, it will pull the jet fighter to the ground or severely damage the craft by ripping it out.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this