Cover Image: August 2004 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Oppenheimer Judged -- Kelvin Corrected -- Agassiz Contradicted [Preview]















Share on Tumblr

AUGUST 1954

COLD WAR CASUALTY--"By a four to one vote the Atomic Energy Commission held J. Robert Oppenheimer to be a security risk and unemployable for any further atomic work in the national defense. In the Commission, dissent came from the scientist member of the jury. Henry D. Smyth asserted that Oppenheimer's continued employment would 'not endanger the common defense and security,' but on the contrary would 'continue to strengthen the United States.' His opinion presented in sharp focus the disagreement between scientists and the national administration over the present security system. The four members who condemned Oppenheimer based their decision on 'fundamental defects in his character,' and on his Communist associations, which they found 'have extended far beyond the tolerable limits of prudence and self-restraint' expected of a man in his position."


Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Oppenheimer Judged -- Kelvin Corrected -- Agassiz Contradicted: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X