Cover Image: March 2013 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Organic versus Conventional: A Scanner May Say Which Is Healthier

A mobile scanner may tell shoppers which piece of fruit has the most vitamins















Share on Tumblr



Image: Thomas Fuchs

Are organic foods more nutritious than conventionally raised ones? Stanford University scientists cast doubt on that concept last year in a widely publicized report. But the gritty little secret is that whether your apples and spinach are organic or not, nutrient levels can vary dramatically depending on growing conditions, such as soil type and quality, temperature, and days of sun versus rain. As a consumer, you have no independent way of verifying that you have chosen a superior batch. But what if you had a handheld scanner that would allow you to check nutrient density? “You could compare carrots to carrots,” says Dan Kittredge, executive director of the Bionutrient Food Association, which is raising the funds to research such a device. “If this batch is a dud, pass. If the next one is good, that's where you spend your money.”

The basic technology has existed for decades. Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy—the modality that Kittredge is currently focusing on—has found applications in pharmaceutical manufacturing, medicine, agriculture and astronomy. NIR works on the principle that different molecules vibrate in slightly different ways. When infrared light is transmitted through or reflected from a given sample, certain wavelengths are absorbed more than others by the vibrating chemical bonds. By measuring the fraction of near-infrared light absorbed at each wavelength, scientists can obtain a distinct fingerprint that is characteristic of the sample. The results are precise—and fast. “Gas chromatography can easily take half a day,” says Magdi Mossoba, a research chemist at the fda's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. “NIR can give results in seconds.”

Until recently, NIR and related forms of vibrational spectroscopy were confined to the laboratory, where they required large benchtop instruments that only skilled scientists could operate. Now, with miniaturization, they are being packaged in simple handheld devices that “a worker without a Ph.D. in chemistry can use in a warehouse or in the field,” says Maggie Pax, a senior director at Thermo Fisher Scientific, a leading manufacturer of these tools. Pharmaceutical companies are using them to determine whether batches of raw ingredients are correctly labeled. More than a dozen countries have purchased them to help combat the rising tide of counterfeit drugs. And farmers use them to measure protein levels in grain, which helps to determine its market value.

Still, NIR has one major limitation as far as a supermarket scanner is concerned, which is that it cannot give readings for compounds at a concentration of less than 0.1 percent. The average vegetable is 92 percent water. After that come macronutrients such as carbohydrates and protein (in large enough quantities to be read by NIR), followed by micronutrients, including vitamins, minerals and antioxidants (most of which are too low to detect). The entire concept would be dead if not for one key observation. “Plants develop certain types of compounds in a predictable order and in specific ratios to various minerals, proteins and lipids,” Kittredge says. The task he is undertaking now with the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University is to run thousands of assays on key foods to establish the algorithms needed to develop a workable scanner. “This will happen,” he asserts. “What we don't know is whether it will take three years or 30.”



This article was originally published with the title From A to Zinc.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Trafalgar 08:57 AM 3/1/13

    It's more important to me whether it contains pesticides and other cancer-causing chemicals than whether it has more vitamins...

    Also, how would you scan bananas? You'd have to peel them to scan the fruit itself. Same for oranges, and many other things.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. cookchh in reply to Trafalgar 12:32 PM 3/1/13

    Agreed, I would have never associated organic foods with higher nutrients, just less dissolved pesticides. That is one of the big reasons behind buying organic bananas for baby food, to avoid pesticides. I would highly doubt nutrient content would vary significantly, and probably would not be surprised if organic vegetables had lower nutrient content.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. joe poppa 07:05 PM 3/5/13

    What would be really sweet would be if you could wear something on your wrist that would tell just how much cholesterol you had blocking your veins, so you knew whether you were going to have a heart attack if you ate that last piece of pizza for breakfast.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Organic versus Conventional: A Scanner May Say Which Is Healthier: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X