Extraterrestrial Specks in Antarctic Snow Yield New Clues to Solar System's Past

Micrometeorites buried under decades of snowfall in Antarctica preserve scraps of cosmic chemistry that hint at how organic molecules made it to Earth















Share on Tumblr

Antarctic micrometeorite dig

BURIED TREASURE: In a five-meter-deep Antarctic trench, researchers have access to a wealth of tiny meteoritic particles buried in the snow. Image: Jean Duprat/CSNSM-CNRS

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

Antarctica is nature's forensic freezer, preserving records of the past in layers of largely unsullied ice and snow that scientists have dug up to explore past geologic and atmospheric conditions. The southernmost continent has also proved an ideal hunting ground for meteorites, which stand out atop ice sheets and snowfields and tend to undergo little weathering and terrestrial contamination after arrival.

A new analysis in the May 7 issue of Science comes from a France-based team working at Antarctica's Concordia base that uncovered well-preserved meteorite samples from beneath the surface. The researchers dug up snow from decades past, which fell before the site had a potentially contaminating human presence. Therein they found so-called micrometeorites—tiny specks just a fraction of a millimeter across that nonetheless carry important clues to the birth and evolution of the solar system.

"Antarctica is really one of the best places to collect interplanetary dust," says lead study author Jean Duprat, a cosmochemist at the Nuclear Spectrometry and Mass Spectrometry Center, a joint lab of the French National Center for Scientific Research and the University of Paris-Sud. Surrounded by oceans and covered with ice and snow, Antarctica contains relatively little terrestrial dust to dilute the particles that arrive from space. In a sieved, melted sample collected in 2006, Duprat and his colleagues identified more particles from space than from Earth.

"Here we extracted particles from very, very clean snow layers that fell on Earth about 50 years ago," Duprat says. Among the 148 micrometeorites produced by melting three cubic meters of snow were two, loaded with organic material, that form the basis for the new research. Numerous studies have sought to explain how such carbon-based substances—including prebiotic compounds—arrived on Earth to sow the seeds of life, with research in recent years showing comets and asteroids to both be plausible delivery mechanisms.

"One of the main questions we are addressing with these particles is the birth of the solar system, the material out of which the planets are formed," he says. "If you want to do that, you really have to go for materials from small bodies like asteroids or comets"—primitive objects that have not undergone much melting in the intervening billions of years. The carbonaceous Antarctic micrometeorites appear to be of cometary origin, Duprat says.

Another question is whether the organics that eventually reached Earth are native to the solar system or were inherited from interstellar space and incorporated into the molecular cloud from which the sun and planets formed. Duprat says that the micrometeorites he and his colleagues turned up appear to fall into the native category, based on an analysis of minerals embedded in the particles. "These minerals, a lot of them, are crystalline phases that are typical of the protoplanetary disk and are not typical of interstellar space," Duprat says. "We don't see an interstellar heritage in the minerals."

Nevertheless, says cosmochemist Larry Nittler of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, D.C., who wrote a commentary on the research for Science, "it's not clear that these results shed any light on the origin of organic matter." The micrometeorites are extremely rich in deuterium, a heavy isotope of hydrogen, a trait that was once thought to be a sign of interstellar origin. Now the case is less clear, Nittler says, and some research indicates that deuterium excesses could be produced in the early solar nebula, which would jibe with the Duprat group's mineralogical analysis.

Whatever the ultimate provenance, the Antarctic meteorite particles make for good samples of organic material because they are relatively large, from an interplanetary dust perspective, and contain so much carbon. "Normally you would have something that is something like a few percent carbon, and here it's more than half in volume," Duprat says. As a result, cosmochemists can analyze the organic content in situ, without having to first extract it using chemical solvents.

With so few samples to draw on, Nittler says, it is important to add pieces to the puzzle as Duprat and his colleagues have done. "A lot of these studies are heavily biased to what we get," he says, adding that the new micrometeorites provide a different look at the chemistry of the early solar system. "It's almost like a new class of extraterrestrial material, because they're not like anything we've seen before."



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Wayne Williamson 07:52 PM 5/6/10

    cool article...what i'm trying to understand is when they state that "a lot of them are not interstellar objects" does that mean that most of them are due to collisions with in our solar system...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. alfredschrader 05:05 AM 5/10/10

    Wayne, yes they are saying it originated from our solar system. Our sun & planets did not originate from a disc of material, it's the result of an iron asteroid that collected material at random & became our sun. Everything in the universe is constantly forming , producing light, then re-forming in a constant reaction that never ends. When material collects into a large enough mass it will become a star as the result of the huge gravitational forces which grind atoms together causing them to decompose back into light. This light then recollects in space starting the process over again. This is the formula MC 2 = E (from Einstein).
    The reforming occurs up the atomic scale starting with the most common elements: hydrogen, carbon, etc. Carbon and water abound everywhere. The universe is teaming with life.....Alfred Schrader-

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. alfredschrader 06:07 AM 5/10/10

    When you fuse together two hydrogen atoms into one helium atom, some of the mass of the protons is lost as light. This is the scientific proof that all matter is made of light. Protons & neutrons are made of tiny particles called photons. You can re-form a proton by focusing light into a cold cavity. Also, you can physically smash a proton, & the light will scatter in all directions. You can do this in a lab same as I have. What I have recently discovered is you can add or subtract photons to protons. Simply exposing matter to light will cause it to gain mass. If this matter is placed someplace with less light, the light particles will re-radiate out of the protons. A piece of aluminum exposed to an infrared lamp will warm & gain mass. If placed in a cooler environment, the aluminum atoms will re-radiate the photons back into space. This becomes interesting when you apply it to refrigerants like freon, etc....Alfred-

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Extraterrestrial Specks in Antarctic Snow Yield New Clues to Solar System's Past

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X