Orphaned Babies Show Hormone Disruption Years after Adoption















Share on Tumblr

babies, orphan, neglect

Image:

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

Orphans have a hard lot in life, particularly in Eastern Europe, where state institutions sometimes provide care that has been reduced to simple feeding and changing with a minimum of physical contact. That neglect--even without any other abuse--can take a profound emotional and physical toll, potentially deeply affecting a child's neurobiology. New research shows that children adopted from such institutions who have spent as many as three years in their new homes still suffer from depressed levels of hormones that have been linked to bonding, caring, communicating and stress regulation, among other things.

Alison Wismer Fries and her colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-Madison compared 21 typical youngsters from Milwaukee to 18 children who had been adopted by Milwaukee area residents after spending their first year or so in Romanian and Russian orphanages. Using urine samples, they found that the adopted orphans had significantly lower levels of vasopressin--a hormone that plays a role in familial recognition--circulating in their systems than their peers.

The scientists then had the two groups of children play an interactive computer game with their mothers and, later, an unfamiliar woman. The 30-minute game involved timed "tickling, patting on the head, counting each other's fingers, [and] whispering in each other's ears." Studies in animals have shown that such pleasant physical contact leads to a rise in oxytocin levels--a hormone that seems to help form secure relationships--particularly when the touch comes from a relative. Although the family-reared children showed the expected rise in oxytocin levels when touched by their mothers, the orphans did not exhibit as strong a response.

"We had a rare opportunity to examine children who were reared in extremely aberrant social environments where they were deprived of the kind of care-giving typical for our species," the authors report online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science. "The results of this experiment suggest a potential mechanism whose atypical function may explain the perverse social and emotional difficulties observed in many children who have experienced aberrant caregiving."

The researchers caution that this does not mean that these children are functionally incapable of forming healthy relationships, but note that the findings may explain why such orphans show an affinity for comfort from strangers or difficulties developing friendships, among other potential challenges. "All we are saying is that in the case of some social problems, here is a window into understanding the biological basis for why they happen and how we might design treatments," team leader Seth Pollak says.



Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Orphaned Babies Show Hormone Disruption Years after Adoption

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X