
REWARDING SIGN: Researchers showed that new things affect our brains in the same way rewards do, suggesting why we may be attracted to novelty.
Image: © ISTOCKPHOTO/ALEX SLOBODKIN
-
The Wisdom of Psychopaths
In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...
Read More »
We know not to judge a book by its cover—but new research shows that may be exactly what we do.
Scientists have discovered that novel objects perk up the reward system of our brains, indicating our sense of adventure—exploring or learning something new—may be just as tempting as cash and other prizes in the choices we make. Researchers say the finding may explain why marketers are able to bolster sagging sales by simply repackaging old products.
Brain processes "might encourage you to sample [products previously dismissed] again—even though it doesn't make much sense," says Bianca Wittmann, a neuroscientist at University College London's Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and co-author of the study published today in the journal Neuron. "Just because it has new packaging doesn't mean it has gotten much better."
But Baba Shiv, a professor of marketing at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business, warns marketers to beware of trying to dupe consumers. Although novelty may temporarily boost sales, he says, they will likely slump again once customers realize nothing but the packaging has changed.
Wittmann and her colleagues scanned the brains of 20 volunteers while they played a game in which the goal was to accumulate money. In each trial the researchers showed players four pictures, one of which, if chosen, would net a cash payoff. The images were taken from a bank of 20 postcards, each featuring a different mountain scene. As the game went on, participants learned which images had the highest value.
When subjects selected a postcard that they knew was valuable, a region in their forebrain called the striatum (known to process rewards and pleasures) activated in expectation of their cash prize.
After the game had gone on for awhile, researchers inserted new images of similar landscapes into the mix. They noticed that in nearly all cases, players opted for the fresh shots over the old ones, including the known moneymakers.
"Participants seem to treat the novel ones in a special way," Wittmann says. "Participants treat these novel stimuli as if they expect a higher reward from them."




See what we're tweeting about





2 Comments
Add CommentI know a lot of consumers wary of novelties and faithful to their customary purchases, albeit they like travelling and reading. I suspect that the charm of adventure has been stifled by our dull society and sadly transferred to our mean daily choices: a purchase, a movie, a love affair and so on.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe behavior of the participants seems reasonable to me. I assume that the higher the payout, the rarer the picture, so when a new picture appears after playing for some time, it seems to the player that it could be (not will be) an even higher-payout picture. If there were a known highest payout amount or if there were pictures with negative payout, I think the results would be much different. In real life something new could be good or bad, so I would expect people to give it more attention, but not necessarily believe it to be better than what they have seen before.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this