Cover Image: January 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Paging Dr. Doolittle

The "language" gene FOXP2 proves critical for animal vocalizations















Share on Tumblr

Bats are one of the few animals that show vocal learning, along with humans, some songbirds, whales and dolphins. That is, the sounds they make are not innate but require practice and imitation. Studies in songbirds support the link between FOXP2 and vocal learning, suggesting that as well as controlling how our brain forms, the gene might also influence how we use it. The gene changes its activity in the brains of adult birds when they learn and practice their songs, neuroscientist Stephanie White of the University of California, Los Angeles, has found. “Birds may have the same circuitry that formed the foundations for human language,” White explains. The evidence points to FOXP2 being a switch, she says, that different species put to varying uses in their neural machinery.

The gene’s story hints at how evolution puts old materials to new uses, points out psychologist Gary Marcus of New York University. “It’s a very good entrée into language and how it relates to whatever preadaptations for language we inherited from our ancestors.”

Doing the FOXP2 Trot
Johannes Krause was surprised when Neandertals turned out to have the same version of FOXP2 as humans. His previous studies of the genetic variation in modern populations had suggested that the human form of the gene arose within the past 200,000 years—150,000 years after Neandertals and modern human lineages diverged. It shows, he says, that our understanding of how current genetics reflects our evolutionary past may need revising.

But Krause still thinks that FOXP2 has been under recent selection pressure in the human lineage. It may have changed just before Neandertals and humans split, he speculates, or it might have helped make our common ancestor more intelligent. “In the fossil record 500,000 years ago, there’s a huge increase in brain size,” Krause notes. “It’s hard to say if it was anything to do with FOXP2, but something was going on.”



This article was originally published with the title Paging Dr. Doolittle.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

John Whitfield is a freelance science writer based in London.


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Paging Dr. Doolittle: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X