Cover Image: May 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Patent Watch

Patent No. 8,118,752















Share on Tumblr



Image: Courtesy of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Apparatus and methods for mapping retinal function: More than two million people older than 40 in the U.S. suffer from glaucoma. The disease—­one of the leading causes of blindness— is the result of damage to ganglion cells in the retina. Early-stage glaucoma is treatable, and the earlier it is caught, the easier it is to reverse. But catching glaucoma is not easy, because it often starts at the edge of the retina, beyond our usual field of vision. The standard way of detecting it is decades old and involves placing a contact lens with a single electrode embedded within it on the eye. The subject is shown a series of light flashes, and the electrode picks up the electrical responses from the retina. “What’s missing in that signal is any spatial differences in the health of the retina,” says John Hetling, a researcher at the University of Illinois.

It is difficult for doctors to determine if one part of the retina is healthy and another part is not. Hetling and his team wanted to improve on the standard method. They are working on a lens that holds far more electrodes—between 33 and 57. These extra electrodes allow for diagnoses of a larger area of the retina in far less time. Their device, patent No. 8,118,752, could also help detect other retinal diseases caused by diabetes, hypertension, sickle-cell anemia and premature birth.



This article was originally published with the title Patent Watch.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. sheilapage 12:52 PM 4/20/12

    The article is misleading and carelessly phrased. Glaucoma is not reversible. And the standard ways of detecting it are by measuring intra-ocular pressure, measuring fields, and examining the nerve.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Bops 02:10 PM 4/21/12

    The problem is that some of these articles are written by people who don't care about the subject and simply want money for the article.
    Even the careless title gives no clue of the subject as the article breezes along.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Patent Watch: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X