Cover Image: February 2001 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Patently Inefficient [Preview]

A new industry is thrashed by waves of litigation















Share on Tumblr

More In This Article

Flipping through the quarterly report that Affymetrix issued last November, investors may have noticed a section entitled "The company may lose customers unless it improves its ability to manufacture its products and ensure their proper performance." Indeed, the firm took almost five years to address frequent complaints from researchers that it delivered chips that sometimes gave spurious results and often arrived months after they had been ordered. Fortunately for Affymetrix, until recently it had no real competitors to lose customers to, thanks largely to a formidable portfolio of issued and pending patents that now number more than 400, according to Stephen P. A. Fodor, its chief executive. "We have license agreements with 20 other companies," Fodor says. But he acknowledges that the licenses restrict those other firms to making arrays that have only about a tenth as many genetic probes as Affymetrix's gene chips do.

Other microarray producers responded in two ways: with lawsuits and with patents of their own on different microarray designs. Incyte Genomics, for example, uses robots to deposit up to 10,000 presynthesized genetic probes onto a glass slide. Motorola has prototypes of chips that hold the probes inside a thin slab of gel. But companies' aggressive patenting has led to a bewildering web of lawsuits (above)¿and it may only get worse. "If we want to make a medical diagnostic with 40 genes on it, and 20 companies hold patents on those genes, we may have a big problem," says Nicholas J. Naclerio, head of Motorola's BioChip division. "It isn't at all clear how this is going to work out."



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Patently Inefficient: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X