Arendt agrees that a new name is in order, but says that biologists do not have one prepared because they disagree about whether mouth and anus formation or another key innovation should be used to name the group.
Just as molecular techniques have revealed data that triggered revisions in cell biology, techniques to sequence genes and observe their activity are now challenging long-standing evolutionary scenarios. "At the turn of the twentieth century, embryologists drew what they saw. But their microscopes stunk and they didn't know about genes," Martindale says. "Now we're finally able to look closer, and we're finding that they're often wrong. But if you think about the tools they had, maybe it's more surprising that anything is right at all."
This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on October 26, 2012.



See what we're tweeting about





7 Comments
Add CommentVery, very cool. Nice to see *Ottoia* mentioned in passing. Also, what's cooler than a six-inch worm with a protrusile pharynx that looks like huge penis?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisNot much of a caudal appendage on the *Priapulus* in the video, is there?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisBest Headline Ever.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI concur. "Penis worm" normally wouldn't get past the censors.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI hope these biologists figure out the mouth/anus order soon! I know from experience that's not something you want to get backwards, especially when "priapulids" are involved. It just leaves a mess on your hands and a bad taste in your mouth.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisViva La Evolucion of the Penis Worm
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRaoul Now, What's first, Mouth or Anus?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this