
Image: Courtesy of Microsoft Research
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
Hopes for new drugs that would slow or stop the inexorable decline of Alzheimer’s patients have repeatedly foundered in recent years. In one example, Eli Lilly had to halt the trial of a drug designed to prevent the production of toxic proteins in the brain because patients’ cognition actually worsened while they were taking it.
Scientists are now looking to the computer industry for alternative ways to help patients. One approach is centered on a small camera called SenseCam, worn like a necklace, that snaps photographs automatically throughout the day. The idea is to use the images not to replace memory but to stimulate it. Each photograph can serve as a cue, like Marcel Proust’s madeleine, tapping into the web of remembrances that collectively defines a person’s identity.
SenseCam, developed by Microsoft and now marketed by a company called Vicon, uses a fish-eye lens to capture a wide-angle view. At regular intervals—say, every 30 seconds—a new image gets stored in the one-gigabyte solid-state memory. When the wearer moves from one room to another, a sensor that picks up the change in light triggers SenseCam to take a new photograph. Further, if a person walks by, an infrared sensor detects the body heat and signals that it is time for another photo. The result is a thumbnail chronology of the minutiae of the wearer’s daily life. Later, patients or their caregivers pipe this electronic thumbnail record into a PC to display the images either individually or in chronological sequence.
Dozens of groups are now working on pilot tests of the device for memory impairments. The studies remain anecdotal but are still compelling. Steve Hodges of Microsoft Research Cambridge remembers an Alzheimer’s patient who described a day trip with his spouse in Spain while wearing SenseCam, which produced images that the man could then “study.” The patient, though, wondered aloud how the couple had arrived at their destination. His wife then interjected that he had taken the device off on the train because he was embarrassed to be sporting a funny-looking gizmo. Reviewing the pictures may be a form of brain calisthenics for enhancing the mental process known as autobiographical memory, recalling the time and place of past events. The ability to engage in this type of mental time travel is just what Alzheimer’s obliterates.
Some people are skeptical about the device. “We have found that older individuals, particularly those with memory impairment, are often averse to technology,” says Paul Aisen, a physician and researcher at the University of California, San Diego, who has assisted with the design of Alzheimer’s drug trials. If the device works (and it is too early to tell if it does), SenseCam would merely slow deterioration. A delay of cognitive decline for only a few years could yield a major public health benefit by letting patients hold on to vestiges of memory. A picture might be worth more than 1,000 milligrams.
This article was originally published with the title Photographic Memory.
Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.




See what we're tweeting about





3 Comments
Add CommentWhen I was reading this article I thought of a different application for such devices. People with no memory problems could use it to compare how different thing actually are from the way we remember them. I could conceivably advance a persons perception of reality.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisReality is generally better than delusion, of course. But in social contexts, is a dispassionate snapshot always better than a normal memory?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisA normal long-term memory is stripped of irrelevant details, parsimoniously stored in the form of connections to other memories, reconstructed on the fly, and subject to review and updates every time it is accessed.
A steady stream of photos, on the other hand, is raw data in massive quantities. A healthy person reviewing such a data stream would inevitably take mental shortcuts to cope- cognitive biases.
Can you imagine a lovers' quarrel consisting of hundreds of the most damning out-of-context quotes carefully selected from a database of millions of trivial everyday disappointments? Or worse yet, a racism fueled not just by feelings and an experience or two last month, but by massive amounts of data massaged into a 'scientific' conclusion?
So no, artificial memory will not necessarily make us happier or better people. But I can hope that we will soon learn how to deal with the downsides to the technology.
You are missing the major point that advancing technologies provide more choices and more possible actions if one uses them. Whether or not any given person benefits from these additional freedoms (available actions) is entirely up to them. But such additional freedoms will at least enable some people to learn to be more rational in their interactions with others. For those who irrationally misuse these additional freedoms, I, for one, will simply not interact with them, unless that misuse is physically or legally targeted at me, and I will suggest to others that they do the same.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIn particular wrt: "But in social contexts, is a dispassionate snapshot always better than a normal memory?" The fairly recent explosion of portable and stationary (subways, police stations, stores, etc.) videos of police actions have shown themselves to be highly more accurate than the memories of the involved officers themselves. How many people, or their surviving families, in the past never experienced justice because the law enforcement agent's memory was accepted as superior to ("better than") any statements by disagreeing witnesses, if there were any?
MoreLife for the rational - http://morelife.org
Reality based tools for more life in quantity and quality
The Self-Sovereign Individual Project - http://selfsip.org
Self-sovereignty, rational pursuit of optimal lifetime happiness,
individual responsibility, social preferencing & social contracting