Are Pesticides from Plants Dangerous to Humans?

It remains unclear how the pesticides from plants known as pyrethroids affect human health















Share on Tumblr

In addition to inhaling or absorbing pyrethroids that linger in households, people ingest traces of pyrethroids in their food, since the chemicals are used on some vegetable, fruit and grain crops.

A 2006 EPA review found that the risk of exposure through diet was at or below the agency’s level of concern for most people. But the study also found that infants and toddlers are highly exposed in some foods, especially bananas, pineapple and dried-oat baby food.

“Now that we know people are exposed to pyrethroids widely, we need to determine what the exact health effects are,” said Barr.

So far, there is little scientific data evaluating the potential threat to human health.

Studies with lab animals have linked pyrethroid exposure to damage of the thyroid, liver and nervous system, as well as impairment of behavioral development, changes in the immune system and disruption of reproductive hormones, according to the 2006 EPA review. These animal studies are relevant to human health because pyrethroids act on functions of the nervous system common to all animals, according to the EPA.

Some pyrethroids imitate the hormone estrogen and can increase levels of estrogen in breast cancer cells, and some are suspected carcinogens. Other data suggest that people using the chemicals are at risk of aggravated allergies or asthma, although the EPA concluded last year that there is no clear link.

Pesticide manufacturers say that pyrethroids are safe and that they are vital to agriculture and to combating mosquitoes that carry West Nile Virus and other diseases.

“Pyrethroids are an extremely important class of insecticidal compounds with major public health and agricultural uses,” Rex Runyon, a vice president at CropLife America, a trade group that represents pesticide companies, said in an email. Runyon added that pyrethroids “do not pose unreasonable effects to human health or the environment” when used according to the directions on the label.

Although little data exist about human health concerns, evidence is growing that pyrethroids might be harming aquatic ecosystems. Studies of streams and rivers in California, Texas and Illinois suggest that the pesticides might be wiping out small organisms that live in the waterways and form the base of the food chain.

A 2009 study found the pesticides in urban stream sediments in central Texas, where they are widely used to control fire ant and grub worm infestations. The concentrations are lethal to a small, shrimp-like crustacean called Hyalella azteca - a species commonly used in laboratories to investigate the effects of pesticides on invertebrates necessary for healthy rivers.

“All of our sampling sites were very close to neighborhoods with manicured lawns,” said Jason Belden, an Oklahoma State University zoologist and author of the study published in the journal Environmental Pollution. “Some people are not following the best management practices. They’re not being careful enough with pesticides. We all need to make an effort to only use pesticides when we need them.”

Pyrethroids are showing up not only in sediments, but also in the currents of California rivers, at levels toxic to insects and aquatic invertebrates that fish and other animals feed on.

Biologist Donald Weston of the University of California, Berkeley, looked for the insecticides in urban runoff, sewage treatment plant effluent, and agricultural drains in California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. In the laboratory, Weston tested the toxicity of these samples on the shrimp-like Hyalella azteca.



9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. wufuheng 09:00 PM 2/27/10

    good news

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. fighter67 08:07 AM 3/1/10

    chrysanthemum tea has been drunk in china for thousands of years if its so dangerous I think we would of heard by now..

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jssarce7 02:15 PM 3/1/10

    The articles mentions correctly: "The compounds are synthetic versions of naturally occurring insecticides....." The natural form is called pyrethrum and is not so damaging or persistent in the environment. The chemist are not synthezising the same compound, they are altering it and making it more dangerous, and that's why it is called pyrethroids.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. SAK 03:47 PM 3/2/10

    Calling these "pesticides from plants" is misleading. Look up the structural formulas of pyrethroids, and you will see they have generally been synthesized on the skeleton of a natural plant product, but they so festooned with halogens (F, Cl, Br) that they look a lot more like a synthetic organic chemical than a natural product. It is no surprise they have undesirable human health characteristics, and only a pity they are called by a name that makes people think they are very similar to safer natural compounds that biodegrade very quickly. Ten minutes with any search engine can convince you that these are fundamentally not "pesticides from plants."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. PeterROwen 07:05 PM 3/15/10

    Of course such peesticides are dangerous to humans; what a silly question. Almost everything you see is poisonous it just depends on the amount.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. bertwindon in reply to jssarce7 02:55 AM 4/2/10

    I'm no chemist, but I believe that "pyrethroids" would be the various constituents of the "Pyrethrum" produces by Chrysanths. Chemist would have sorted them out, one at a time, from the Pyrethrum from the plant.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. bertwindon in reply to PeterROwen 02:59 AM 4/2/10

    Ah yes "pisticide" - an new way to go, which involves a snow-covered mountain, and pair of skis. Or would that be "Off-peesticide" ? - or maybe "Piss-offticide" ?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. SAK in reply to bertwindon 02:04 PM 4/7/10

    No, the pyrethroids are synthetic chemicals, not constituents of a natural mixture.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. SSurman 01:01 AM 6/2/10

    Chrysanthemums work very well in gardens, especially vegetable gardens for pest control. For control of grubs, fleas, ticks and mosquitos the use of nematodes sprayed on lawns and gardens is the best solution and the benefits last for approximately three months. It will not kill beneficial insects such as lady bugs that control aphids and other insects. The organic path is simple, less expensive and there is none of the runoff contaminating our waterways. We need to wake up and make an effort to stop using these toxic chemicals. I learned the hard way after being exposed to pyrethrins thinking it was a "natural" and harmless product. It is a neurtoxin. That's how it kills insects-it disrupts the nervous system. Thanks Monsanto!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Are Pesticides from Plants Dangerous to Humans?

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X