Poisoning the Well: How the Feds Let Energy and Mining Companies Pollute Underground Water

Aquifer exemptions give industry permission to pollute underground freshwater reservoirs















Share on Tumblr

From ProPublica.org (find the original story here); reprinted with permission.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



« Prev 1 2 3 4 5

12 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. sparcboy 02:15 PM 12/11/12

    In many areas, communities cannot get water from wells because it causes subsidence, so all of their drinking water comes from surface sources. For decades these waters have been polluted by numerous industries, agriculture and even the waste discharge of other communities upstream. Farmers continue to drench our water with fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides

    Federal officials have given these entities permission to pollute water in many places across the country...

    And now all the focus seems solely on energy companies.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. frankblank 02:25 PM 12/11/12

    Well, if aquifers can't afford campaign or SuperPac contributions, what do you expect.

    On top of that, I've never seen an aquifer hire a congressional slug as a lobbyist, so what do you expect?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. RSchmidt 03:09 PM 12/11/12

    The EPA is misnomer and an empty shell. They have long been a rubber stamp for any kind of environmental assault so long as someone profits from it. EPA has fought to have their authority diminished and have had to be prosecuted to force them to do their job. Counting on the EPA to protect the environment is like counting on republicans to protect lower income families. Well call up the lawyers because this isn't going to be fixed any other way.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. turell 06:09 PM 12/11/12

    I don't see any proof of contamination of potable aquifers in the article. Only a presumption that they will be contaminated. Why is that assumed?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Abrahm Lustgarten in reply to turell 06:35 PM 12/11/12

    I'm the author of the article. To clarify -- There are no assumptions here about contamination, and these are not cases of "risk" of contamination. These are cases in which the EPA has set up a process and overseen the ongoing injection of pollutants. The site permits list the contaminants being injected, the volume, the flow rate, and the aquifer formation receiving them. When the SDWA designates a USDW - an underground source of drinking water -- it has by definition defined it as potable and a viable source.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. greenhome123 06:42 PM 12/11/12

    I personally like a bit of fracking fluids, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizers in my drinking water. Especially in the morning. It gives me that extra boost of energy I need to make it through the day. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Yea, it might kill a kid or older person, but who cares about them anyways.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. MD from MN 10:49 PM 12/11/12

    Destroying tomorrow to cash in today... why is this perverse, self-cannibalizing behavior still tolerated in the United States? How do the dynamics of greed, cronyism, corruption and influence-peddling make destruction of our fresh water supply acceptable? One suggestion: Require insurance coverage on all fracking operations to place in escrow an environmental trust fund sufficient to repair any environmental damage from operations, regardless of cause. Counter greed with responsibility.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. cajquark 10:20 AM 12/12/12

    The issue not being addressed is that the people who want to dispose of their industrial waste in the underground aquifers do not want to pay to clean up their waste. Instead, they want to pass the cost of cleanup to others, namely the public.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Unksoldr 11:18 AM 12/12/12

    Capitalism at it's best.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Uniformity 12:23 PM 12/12/12

    So much for the governments interest in its people. You guys are right, we are freakin corporate slaves and always will be because no good man can take the political job without the intent of their own greed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. patrickh74 01:20 PM 12/12/12

    EPA is pathetic and powerless! As long as power and fuel companies are allowed to pay off politicians, this bending over of America will absolutely continue. Make lobbyests illegal in Washington. Make it illegal for politicians to go on "vacations" on the lobbyest's dime. Make the idiots in Congress (opposite of progress) do their own research and actually have their constiuant's best interest in mind for once. But..... probably not.... in America!!!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. Quinn the Eskimo 12:34 AM 12/15/12

    Want to see what's in store for poor and underrepresented peoples?

    List to a snake. Grover Norquist. He's running a coup on the U.S. He has never been elected to sh:t.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Poisoning the Well: How the Feds Let Energy and Mining Companies Pollute Underground Water

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X