From ProPublica.org (find the original story here); reprinted with permission.
Aquifer exemptions give industry permission to pollute underground freshwater reservoirs
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Deadline: Jul 30 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Seeker desires a method for producing pseudoephedrine products in such a way that it will be extremely difficult for clandestine che
Powered By: 
12 Comments
Add CommentIn many areas, communities cannot get water from wells because it causes subsidence, so all of their drinking water comes from surface sources. For decades these waters have been polluted by numerous industries, agriculture and even the waste discharge of other communities upstream. Farmers continue to drench our water with fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFederal officials have given these entities permission to pollute water in many places across the country...
And now all the focus seems solely on energy companies.
Well, if aquifers can't afford campaign or SuperPac contributions, what do you expect.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisOn top of that, I've never seen an aquifer hire a congressional slug as a lobbyist, so what do you expect?
The EPA is misnomer and an empty shell. They have long been a rubber stamp for any kind of environmental assault so long as someone profits from it. EPA has fought to have their authority diminished and have had to be prosecuted to force them to do their job. Counting on the EPA to protect the environment is like counting on republicans to protect lower income families. Well call up the lawyers because this isn't going to be fixed any other way.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI don't see any proof of contamination of potable aquifers in the article. Only a presumption that they will be contaminated. Why is that assumed?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI'm the author of the article. To clarify -- There are no assumptions here about contamination, and these are not cases of "risk" of contamination. These are cases in which the EPA has set up a process and overseen the ongoing injection of pollutants. The site permits list the contaminants being injected, the volume, the flow rate, and the aquifer formation receiving them. When the SDWA designates a USDW - an underground source of drinking water -- it has by definition defined it as potable and a viable source.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI personally like a bit of fracking fluids, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizers in my drinking water. Especially in the morning. It gives me that extra boost of energy I need to make it through the day. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Yea, it might kill a kid or older person, but who cares about them anyways.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisDestroying tomorrow to cash in today... why is this perverse, self-cannibalizing behavior still tolerated in the United States? How do the dynamics of greed, cronyism, corruption and influence-peddling make destruction of our fresh water supply acceptable? One suggestion: Require insurance coverage on all fracking operations to place in escrow an environmental trust fund sufficient to repair any environmental damage from operations, regardless of cause. Counter greed with responsibility.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe issue not being addressed is that the people who want to dispose of their industrial waste in the underground aquifers do not want to pay to clean up their waste. Instead, they want to pass the cost of cleanup to others, namely the public.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisCapitalism at it's best.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSo much for the governments interest in its people. You guys are right, we are freakin corporate slaves and always will be because no good man can take the political job without the intent of their own greed.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisEPA is pathetic and powerless! As long as power and fuel companies are allowed to pay off politicians, this bending over of America will absolutely continue. Make lobbyests illegal in Washington. Make it illegal for politicians to go on "vacations" on the lobbyest's dime. Make the idiots in Congress (opposite of progress) do their own research and actually have their constiuant's best interest in mind for once. But..... probably not.... in America!!!!!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWant to see what's in store for poor and underrepresented peoples?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisList to a snake. Grover Norquist. He's running a coup on the U.S. He has never been elected to sh:t.