DISTRESS CAN BE a normal
response to pain and loss or
a sign of a psychic wound that is failing to heal. Critics of PTSD diagnostic criteria, including many soldiers, feel that returning veterans natural process of adjustment is often mislabeled as a dysfunctional state.
TYLER HICKS New York Times
Key Concepts
- The syndrome of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is under fire because its defining criteria are too broad, leading to rampant overdiagnosis.
- The flawed PTSD concept may mistake soldiers' natural process of adjustment to civilian life for dysfunction.
- Misdiagnosed soldiers receive the wrong treatments and risk becoming mired in a Veterans Administration system that encourages chronic disability.
More from the Magazine
April
2009 Issue- Updates Updates: Whatever Happened to Melting Glaciers and Ocean Levels?
- Skeptic Skeptic's Take on the Origins of Success
- News Scan Finding Balance: A Novel Theory on Seasickness
- Buy the Digital Edition
In 2006, soon after returning from military service in Ramadi, Iraq, during the bloodiest period of the war, Captain Matt Stevens of the Vermont National Guard began to have a problem with PTSD, or post-traumatic stress disorder. Stevens's problem was not that he had PTSD. It was that he began to have doubts about PTSD: the condition was real enough, but as a diagnosis he saw it being wildly, even dangerously, overextended.
Stevens led the medics tending an armored brigade of 800 soldiers, and his team patched together GIs and Iraqi citizens almost every day. He saw horrific things. Once home, he said he had his share of "nights where I'd wake up and it would be clear I wasn't going to sleep again."
Read Comments (90) | Post a comment
RSS Feeds
Blog
Podcasts
Mobile
Widgets