Quantum Chaos

What would classical chaos, which lurks everywhere in our world, do to quantum mechanics, the theory describing the atomic and subatomic worlds?















Share on Tumblr

In the scattering problem the zeros of the zeta function give the values of the momentum where the time delay changes strongly. The chaos of the Riemann zeta function is particularly apparent in a theorem that has only recently been proved: the zeta function fits locally any smooth function. The theorem suggests that the function may describe all the chaotic behavior a quantum system can exhibit. If the mathematics of quantum mechanics could be handled more skillfully, many examples of locally smooth, yet globally chaotic, phenomena might be found.



« Prev 2 3 4 5 6 7

11 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. archwayold 07:41 PM 10/27/08

    I long for the good old days when intelligent people dominated the news. The only way to get attention these days is to forecast doom or blow yourself up!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Itch 06:40 AM 10/28/08

    Am I being thick? The text refers to a number of crucial figures, where are they?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. tonyv414 10:37 AM 10/28/08

    Tying this all to the zeta function seems to always be where such discussions of quantum (and other) chaos end. So many things seem to be built of characters which resemble the prime numbers - doesn't anyone notice the semantics of it all? When one asks the question " What exactly do I mean by prime and composite?" - one begins to realize that mathematics is "just another language".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. gs_chandy 04:55 AM 10/29/08

    WHERE ARE THE FIGURES???

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. gmusser 05:15 PM 11/3/08

    Sorry about the lack of figures, folks. We didn't have them handy and thought it more important to get the article out than to wait for the images.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. gs_chandy 09:46 PM 11/3/08

    The article is excellent. However, the lack of figures illustrating/discussing the text makes it much less valuable than it should be. Surely SciAm should have been able to get hold of those figures by now? Please do publish them and let us know that you have done so. Thanks, -- GSC

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. eco-steve 05:58 PM 11/26/08

    In arithmetic, operations are interchangeable if they are commutative. Nest non-commutative operations in program loops and results will be truncated with rounding errors, because decimal numbers are not reals. So such simple iterative loops cause results to go haywire within a few dozen repetitions. You can write computer programs to calculate as we do long-hand to great precision, but this increases execution times exponentially. No doubt to calculate quantum phases, computers are used, but how can we write programs which are not inherently chaotic, in view of the fact that we cannot know the position and velocity of a sub-atomic particle. Chaos theory applies to calculations as much as to physics. This article begs the question?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. luzhiyang1118 01:18 AM 1/11/10

    It's excellent

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. BST 09:07 AM 4/29/10

    There are so many things to be understood from that text that I'm sure I don't understand the tenth of it.

    But quantum chaos seems to be a link between quamtum and classical mechanics. I am a determinist, I think that the probabilistic description of current quantum mechanics is just a statistical view of something that is in fact much more complex - a new mechanics to discover ? Anyway, I'm sure that quantum chaos has a role to play in all of this, I guess the future greatest progress in fundamental physics will have to do something with quantum chaos.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Eureka999 04:47 PM 6/27/10

    Consider the answer lays in the faqct that we need to look at the Universe at a much smaller scale.

    What if the electron itself was not a fundamental particle but made up from 1.23 x 10 to the power of 20, such particles. Now everything makes a lot more sense it is not a probability density distribution -it is a cloud. Moreover, a cloud is almost exactly what you see when you look at the electron experimentally and mathematically.

    You get quiter a lot of determinim back into your equations, but you haqve to remeber at that scale space-time is made nof the same harmonic quintessence. bottom mline is nyou will almost always get some chaos coming in - hence Heisenberg's uncertainty.

    The bonus is that you can now deirive things like E=mc2 from first principles. See: The formulation od harmonic quintessence and a fundamental enenrgy equivalence equation. See Physics Essays 23: 311-319.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. rejumal 10:33 AM 10/7/10

    You can find the figures at http://www.dhushara.com/book/quantcos/qchao/quantc.htm I'm not sure why they haven't been included...?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Quantum Chaos

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X