The Civil War and Malaria

A patriotic appeal to fight against a common scourge of the day: malaria














Share on Tumblr

Modern chemistry has succeeded in extracting the medicinal principle from Peruvian bark, so that now the former may be taken without the great mass of crude impurities in the latter. This extract is called quinine.

A prejudice has been created against quinine, we believe mainly by the inventors of patent nostrums for the sake of selling their own wares. Twenty years ago there was a famous pill sold in the Western States as a cure for fever and ague. It was called Sappingtons pill, and was a powerful remedy. Dr. Beaumont, of St. Louis, analyzed it, and found that all its medicinal virtues were due to the arsenic which it contained. Now, quinine is a vegetable substance, and is decomposed in the system into gases which pass away. But arsenic, like all of the metallic poisons, remains in the system, and if successive doses of it are taken, however small, they accumulate until the quantity becomes sufficient to destroy life. And killing the patient is not the worst of its effects; it produces a frightful train of diseases, more terrible than death. There is no greater folly than the buying of patent medicines to cure fever and ague.. If they will cure the disease they must contain either Peruvian bark or arsenic. If they contain the latter they are of course to be avoided; and if the former, it is better to purchase the pure quinine at the druggists than to pay a swindling price to have it mixed with the useless and frequently deleterious compounds that are employed to disguise it.

This substance will almost invariably cure the milder forms of malarious disease, and a few years ago it was discovered, at about the same time both in Italy and this country, that even congestive fever could frequently be cured by enormous doses of quinine. Since that discovery, a considerable number of persons have been snatched from the very jaws of death by spoonfuls of this powerful extract. It is important that the remedy should be properly administered, and when a soldier is attacked he will of course consult the surgeon of the regiment; our advice refers only to the prevention of the disease.

TO PREVENT THE ATTACKS OF MALARIOUS DISEASE
All experience has confirmed the observation of the natives of Peru, that Peruvian bark has a powerful influence in counteracting the poison of malaria. Though, after malarious poison is absorbed into the system, it sometimes remains many months before manifesting its presence outside of the tropics it is propagated only in the months of August, September and October; and if during these three months a small quantity of Peruvian bark or quinine is taken daily, it will generally prevent the occurrence of the disease. As much as can be taken up on the point of a penknife say to the length of half an inch will, as a rule, be sufficient; though if the dose is doubled it is immaterial. It can he taken by placing it directly on the tongue, as, though bitter, it is a clean bitter, not unpleasant to most people. If the taste is not agreeable, however, it may be put into the coffee at breakfast, when it will not be perceived.

We advise all of our soldiers to consult the surgeons of their several regiments in regard to the wisdom of this course, and if it is sanctioned by them, as it will be, to follow it resolutely. The quinine would doubtless be furnished from the army chest, as the government could not expend money more judiciously for securing the efficiency of the troops, and consequently for the vigorous prosecution of the war.


4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. deals231 09:41 AM 7/16/11

    Hey I absolutely love this write-up and it was so nice so I am surely going to tweet it. I Have to say the Indepth research this article has is greatly extraordinary !!! Who goes that extra mile now days? Well Done !
    <a href="http://www.stayinlondon.net "> London Hotels </a>

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ironjustice 02:17 PM 7/16/11

    You should read more about how 'someone' actually had it BANNED and used it as a weapon of war by refusing to allow it to be distributed. It is a story of corruption and people whose seed to this day should be strung up and left for the vultures. Imho. 'They' are doing it again as we speak.
    "Dealing With The Quinine Ban"

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. ironjustice 02:29 PM 7/16/11

    "We believe that never till the present highly humane and civilized war have medicines been made contraband. Yet even before the open rupture, Northern apothecaries refused to sell quinine and other articles in their trade, and since the war, none whatever are permitted to cross the border. The inhumanity which thus makes war upon the sick and afflicted, is, we believe, unparalleled in the history of civilized nations. There is, however, this consolation, that medicines in general kill more than they cure."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. ironjustice 04:11 PM 7/16/11

    "Sterling withheld the Bayer patent for atabrine, a quinine substitute. Thousands of GIs died needlessly from malaria for the lack of quinine or atabrine. Quinine became especially scarce after the Japanese seizure of the Dutch East Indies. However, atabrine was freely available to those on the list of Proclaimed Customers in South America but Crowley refuse to release it for use by American soldiers."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Civil War and Malaria

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X