Cover Image: July 2011 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Reflections on the Mind

Experiments with a simple mirror setup can reveal much about the workings of the brain














Share on Tumblr

Litmus Test for Self-Awareness
Let us return to normal perception again and describe an observation we made in collaboration with Eric Altschuler of UMDNJ–New Jersey Medical School.

Have a friend sit behind an ordinary writing desk. In front of the desk, place a mirror so that it covers it completely and you can see only your friend’s torso behind the desk. Now stand at a distance of 20 feet from the desk, look at her and carefully align her torso with the reflection of your lower trunk and feet. Now walk toward the desk, and you will see your friend “walking toward you” with her feet moving in perfect synchrony with your own. If you are among the lucky 75 percent of subjects, you will have a spooky sensation of an out-of-body experience with “you” out there inhabiting your friend’s body, presumably because this is the only way your brain can interpret the perfect synchrony of her legs and yours. Try having her move her face a bit. Does that enhance or diminish the effect?

You may ask why this effect does not occur when you simply walk toward the mirror looking at your own reflection. The answer is twofold. First, can you really be sure it does not? When you shave or put on makeup do you not, at least to a limited extent, “project” yourself into the mirror? Perception is a multilayered phenomenon—hence, it is prone to endless paradoxes in contrived situations. Second, given your lifelong experience with mirrors, you have become habituated; just as horses are not normally scared of their own shadows. A feral child (or man) seeing himself in a mirror the very first time might indeed experience himself inhabiting the stranger in the mirror.

Finally, Gordon Gallup, Jr., now at the University at Albany, has suggested that mirrors can provide a litmus test for self-awareness, a topic that has been much discussed by philosophers for two millennia. When a chimp is asleep, dab a splotch of paint on its forehead. If you show it a mirror when it wakes up, it will spontaneously reach for its forehead to remove the splotch; it does not reach into the mirror. This response may or may not tell us that the chimp is self-conscious, but it does show that the chimp knows that it is looking at itself in the mirror and that it is looking at a reflection—a capacity that eludes monkeys. They fail the test.

We saw a 70-year-old neurological patient recently who, despite her progressive Alzheimer’s-type dementia, remained fairly intelligent and articulate. Her main presenting symptom, disturbing to her family members, was that she was terrified of seeing her own reflection: mirror phobia. She kept referring to it as a malevolent phantom twin who was following her. So all reflecting surfaces in her house had to be covered. Yet when we did the Gallup mirror splotch test on her, she passed, reflexively removing the splotch. This experience shows that merely passing the test does not indicate that you (whether you are a person or a chimp) are aware at a conscious level (“believe”) that what is in the mirror is really “you.”

Thus, mirrors have vast implications, whether for demonstrating the role of visual feedback in treating pain and paralysis or for the psychological and philosophical issues surrounding construction of body image and sense of self by your brain. There’s plenty to reflect on.


This article was originally published with the title Reflections on the Mind.



Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

VILAYANUR S. RAMACHANDRAN and DIANE ROGERS-RAMACHANDRAN are at the Center for Brain and Cognition at the University of California, San Diego. They are on the board of advisers for Scientific American Mind.


3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Spin-oza 12:15 PM 8/18/11

    Yes... the simple mirror can reveal a lot about how the physical brain has evolved, functions and fully instantiates the "mind" and thus the "soul".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ldgregg 01:22 AM 8/19/11

    When we were Catholic school girls in the 60's our nuns told us to never look in a mirror. It was "vane". Vanity was a bad thing back then. So, we grew up having no vision of ourselves (we were nothing). The problem was that the Church encouraged us to become well-educated and when we did, we found that - among many other things - this whole "mirror" thing was really wrong. Look in the mirror and REALLY look. Then, look into your heart and be thankful for who you are and your impression of yourself.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Seishindo 05:10 AM 8/26/11

    I am a big fan of this work and have been using a mirror box for some time now.
    In the article it is written;

    Using two bricks, or some duct tape, prop up an 18-inch-square mirror vertically on a table. Sit so that the edge faces you. Now put your left hand on the table at the left side of the mirror (either palm up or down) and match your right-hand position on the right side. If you now look into the right side of the mirror, you will see the right hand’s reflection optically superimposed in the same place where you feel your left hand to be.
    ///
    I am not sure what is being described.
    Are you setting the mirror so that it is close to perpendicular to you?
    Are you starting with it sitting close to one side of you?

    Is there a picture anywhere that I can use for reference?

    I will be very thankful for any help anyone can give.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

  • melanietbaum If there ARE sex diffs, women always seen as effect to be explained. It's "Why are women high in X?" not "Why are men LOW in X?" #aps2013dc
    2 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • lindy2350 Nothing irks me more than a spokesman saying it's "my duty" to "direct people" to think/act a certain way. Does he know what journalism is?
    20 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • melanietbaum Berdahl: It used to be you could see "sex" or "gender" in title & the main finding might be that there's no diff. Not anymore. #aps2013dc
    35 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Reflections on the Mind: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X