Requiem for a Freshwater Dolphin

It's official: the Yangtze River dolphin is extinct















Share on Tumblr

baiji

BAIJI: This unique freshwater dolphin species persisted for 20 million years before human practices, like rolling hook fishing, wiped it out. Image: COURTESY OF WANG DING

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

The baiji is gone. During six weeks of searching the Yangtze River, scientists and conservationists failed to spot any of the unique creatures. This means, they say, that the "goddess of the Yangtze" is extinct because, even if a scattered few are still around, there are not enough to reproduce and perpetuate the species.

"Our inability to detect any baiji in the main channel of the river despite this intensive search effort has the sad consequence that the prospect of finding and translocating any surviving dolphins to an ex situ reserve—their only conservation hope—has all but vanished," says zoologist Samuel Turvey of the Zoological Society of London. The scientists employed both four continuous spotters as well as a trailing microphone to try to pick up the baiji's waterborne whistles, which have been heard on Earth for at least 20 million years.

There was never a huge number of these freshwater dolphins, characterized by a long, tapering snout and a crestlike, remnant dorsal fin; the several thousand reported in ancient accounts had dwindled to just a few hundred by last decade. A 1999 survey turned up just 13 of the animals and the last time one was sighted and photographed was five years ago, according to a paper documenting the decline in Biology Letters.

The long, slow death of the baiji was caused by overfishing, construction of the Three Gorges Dam and other changes in the vicinity of the Yangtze River (where more than 10 percent of humanity makes its home), rather than hunting or other direct human impacts. Locals living on the banks of the Yangtze still use indiscriminate electrical charges in the water and so-called rolling hooks—long lines set with hundreds of hooks that snag fish (and baiji) foraging on the bottom—decades after they were banned by law. "Once the baiji was caught by one piece of hook, it would struggle to escape and then it would be entangled by more rolling hooks," says Wang Ding, deputy director of the Institute of Hydrobiology (IHB) in Wuhan. "Finally, the animal would drown."

Turvey adds: "We witnessed massive amounts of fishing daily along the river, both legal fishing (gill nets) but also large amounts of illegal rolling-hook long-lining and electrofishing, which have long been banned. … In fact, before we even set off on the survey, fishermen were fishing with long lines right next to our survey boats at the dock in Wuhan."

Despite predictions decades ago of the baiji's decline, few efforts were made to preserve the animal outside its main habitat in a few reserves. One male baiji—nicknamed Qi Qi—became the sole resident of a pool at the Baiji Dolphinarium at the IHB. "The reasons for this inactivity appear to stem from a reluctance to make firm conservation decisions based on limited data, a fear of being seen to fail in a potentially high-risk conservation exercise, and a preference for more 'hands-off' recovering strategies," Turvey says. "Had recommended conservation actions actually been carried out, the baiji would almost certainly be with us today."

The loss of the baiji marks the first extinction of a large animal since the disappearance of the Caribbean monk seal in the 1950s, though the U.N. estimates that three smaller animal or plant species go extinct every hour. And scientists warn that if changes are not made soon, the Yangtze finless porpoise may soon follow its cetacean cousin, having dropped by half from the roughly 2,500 extant in the 1990s.

"Without quick and substantial intervention, the [porpoise] may also soon be extinguished," Ding notes. He says that better studies of this unique animal and more reserves in the Yangtze are required, though scientists at his institute have started a captive breeding program. Two babies—one in 2005 and one this year—have been born, improving the survival odds of this rare freshwater porpoise.

As for the baiji, hope is the last vestige of the animal to die. "The latest unconfirmed sighting of the baiji was April 27, 2006, which is a good reason to suppose that there are likely a few animals living somewhere in the river but hard to find," Ding says. Turvey is among a band of scientists and conservationists that plans to interview fishermen throughout the baiji's historic range, to track down any survivors. But "the continued deterioration of the Yangtze ecosystem," he says, "means that the species has no hope of even short-term survival as a viable population in the river if it has not already disappeared."



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. David M. Clemen 05:05 PM 4/2/08

    The Three Gorges Dam was built as a flood control structure because Yangtze River floods have killed over 300,000 people in the twentieth century. The most recent floods killed 33,000 people in 1954, and over 3,000 people in 1998. Although I regret the extinction of the dolphin, one must weigh this extinction against the many human lives lost by Yangtze River floods. Exactly how many human lives is an increase in biodiversity worth?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Kalyn in reply to David M. Clemen 01:54 AM 8/27/08

    Do you suppose the more intelligent life form might have moved away from the flood risk? It certainly wasn't impossible to relocate millions of people during the construction process. Not sure this was really an either/or choice, but fairly sure that China has little interest in bio anything, after living there for two years.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. hotblack 01:22 PM 10/6/08

    I'd bet if you were facing extinction, and there were seven billion dolphins, you'd feel a bunch of them would be worth a few of you.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Requiem for a Freshwater Dolphin

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X