Key Concepts
- Spent nuclear fuel contains plutonium, which can be extracted and used in new fuel.
- To reduce the amount of long-lived radioactive waste, the U.S. Department of Energy has proposed reprocessing spent fuel in this way and then “burning” the plutonium in special reactors.
- But reprocessing is very expensive. Also, spent fuel emits lethal radiation, whereas separated plutonium can be handled easily. So reprocessing invites the possibility that terrorists might steal plutonium and construct an atom bomb.
- The author argues against reprocessing and for storing the waste in casks until an underground repository is ready.
More to Explore
- Sidebar
A Nuclear Power Renaissance? - Infographic
Nuclear Waste: A Growing Problem - Infographic
Fuel Handing Options - Infographic
Major Danger: Mass Destruction for the Masses - Infographic
Waste Storage Solutions: Dry Casks
More from the Magazine
May
2008 Issue- Letters to the Editors Mailbag: Is Fluoride Dangerous? Is a Solar Grand Plan a Good Idea?
- News Scan This Is Your Mom on Drugs: Aging Doesn't Stop Drug Use
- Skeptic The Brain Is Not Modular: What fMRI Really Tells Us
- Buy the Digital Edition
More from this In-Depth Report
- Features Balancing the Risks and Rewards of a Power Source
- Features Reactivating Nuclear Reactors for the Fight against Climate Change
- 60-Second Earth Forget Nuclear Fission, How About Fusion?
- From the In-Depth Report The Future of Nuclear Power
Although a dozen years have elapsed since any new nuclear power reactor has come online in the U.S., there are now stirrings of a nuclear renaissance. The incentives are certainly in place: the costs of natural gas and oil have skyrocketed; the public increasingly objects to the greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels; and the federal government has offered up to $8 billion in subsidies and insurance against delays in licensing (with new laws to streamline the process) and $18.5 billion in loan guarantees. What more could the moribund nuclear power industry possibly want?
Just one thing: a place to ship its used reactor fuel. Indeed, the lack of a disposal site remains a dark cloud hanging over the entire enterprise. The projected opening of a federal waste storage repository in Yucca Mountain in Nevada (now anticipated for 2017 at the earliest) has already slipped by two decades, and the cooling pools holding spent fuel at the nation’s nuclear power plants are running out of space.
Read Comments (27) | Post a comment



