Cover Image: March 2013 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The Robobee Project Is Building Flying Robots the Size of Insects [Preview]

Thousands of robotic insects will take to the skies in pursuit of a shared goal















Share on Tumblr



LARGER THAN LIFE: This RoboBee is magnified to show detail; turn the page to view at actual size. Image: Travis Rathbone

In Brief

  • RoboBees are flying robots the size of bees. Their size presents a huge assortment of physical and computational challenges. At such small dimensions, off-the-shelf parts such as motors and bearings will prove too inefficient, so the bees must employ specially designed artificial muscles to power and control flight.
  • In addition, the tiny bees must think on their own, using miniature sensors to process environmental cues and processors to make decisions on what to do next.
  • Like real bees, RoboBees will work best when employed as swarms of thousands of individuals, coordinating their actions without relying on a single leader. The hive must be resilient enough so that the group can complete its objectives even if many bees fail.

More In This Article

Not too long ago a mysterious affliction called Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) began to wipe out honeybee hives. These bees are responsible for most commercial pollination in the U.S., and their loss provoked fears that agriculture might begin to suffer as well. In 2009 the three of us, along with colleagues at Harvard University and Northeastern University, began to seriously consider what it would take to create a robotic bee colony. We wondered if mechanical bees could replicate not just an individual's behavior but the unique behavior that emerges out of interactions among thousands of bees. We have now created the first RoboBees—flying bee-size robots—and are working on methods to make thousands of them cooperate like a real hive.

Superficially, the task appears nearly impossible. Bees have been sculpted by millions of years of evolution into incredible flying machines. Their tiny bodies can fly for hours, maintain stability during wind gusts, seek out flowers and avoid predators. Try that with a nickel-size robot.


This article was originally published with the title Flight of the robobees.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jayjacobus 12:35 PM 3/2/13

    This is remarkable technology in that it must address many issues in new ways. The work will undoubtedly add to the knowledge of miniaturization, control, motion, manufacturing, robotics, artificial intelligence and coordination of multiple robots.

    The lack of transmitters and receivers may be overcome by visual cues given by an external manager with special actions given in reply (like tipping their wings or bouncing up and down or making figures in the sky).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Mythusmage 06:51 PM 3/25/13

    Speaking of transmitters, think of what you could observe if these robobees had the ability to transmit video. Then add in ubiquity and make them cheap and easy to construct. How will the world adapt to the coming loss of privacy?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. paulF 10:17 PM 3/30/13

    While the technology to create small remote controlled drones is impressive, there is a subtext here that the potential for catastrophic die-offs of bees (currently being seen and studied in the pages of SA) can be replaced by machines. The fact is, we have damaged our global ecosystem to such a degree that bees are in danger of being eliminated through causes most likely brought about through human intervention - chemical pollution being the likely suspect. We are best focused on eliminating the ecosystem imbalances - pollution - that technology brings about rather than simply thinking we can replace natural processes. Those same processes are complex and interdependent. Technology has brought us to this place of natural degradation - along with overpopulation, overuse of resources, and non-organic farming. Best to focus our energies on how to stop and repair the poisoning of our environment rather that an illusory technology fix.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. paulF 10:17 PM 3/30/13

    While the technology to create small remote controlled drones is impressive, there is a subtext here that the potential for catastrophic die-offs of bees (currently being seen and studied in the pages of SA) can be replaced by machines. The fact is, we have damaged our global ecosystem to such a degree that bees are in danger of being eliminated through causes most likely brought about through human intervention - chemical pollution being the likely suspect. We are best focused on eliminating the ecosystem imbalances - pollution - that technology brings about rather than simply thinking we can replace natural processes. Those same processes are complex and interdependent. Technology has brought us to this place of natural degradation - along with overpopulation, overuse of resources, and non-organic farming. Best to focus our energies on how to stop and repair the poisoning of our environment rather that an illusory technology fix.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Robobee Project Is Building Flying Robots the Size of Insects: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X