Cover Image: December 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Robot Cartoons--Cute; Robot Humans--Creepy

Researchers take a closer look at creepiness in the almost human















Share on Tumblr

The Creepy Express
Hollywood is aware of the potential for the near human to alienate audiences. After working as a lead animator on The Polar Express, a movie criticized for its characters’ high creep quotient, Kenn McDonald and his colleagues at Sony Pictures Imageworks watched the film about five times and, in subsequent projects, decided to animate the rapid, small eye movements called saccades. “If you get the eyes right, everything else is icing on the cake,” McDonald says. Without invoking roboticist Masahiro Mori’s uncanny valley specifically when designing characters, Pixar Animation Studios does not stray far from Mori’s advice. “If your goal is to create realistic humans,” says Pixar production designer Ralph Eggleston, “you run the risk of the audience being distracted when things aren’t just right, instead of having people pay attention to the story.”

Note: This article was originally published with the title, "Into the Uncanny Valley".



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. malcoda 10:31 AM 11/28/08

    ...missing the point. uncanny valley has nothing to do with beauty or the lack there of, nor of scary grotesque horror. It's that creepy feeling when you see something that looks like it should behave like a human...but for some strange reason it just doesn't...something you can't quite put your finger on. Now THATS creepy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. malcoda 10:32 AM 11/28/08

    ...missing the point. uncanny valley has nothing to do with beauty or the lack there of, nor of scary grotesque horror. It's that creepy feeling when you see something that looks like it should behave like a human...but for some strange reason it just doesn't...something you can't quite put your finger on. Now THATS creepy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Innova 11:10 AM 11/29/08

    Well, I certainly would be more comfortable with a iRobot style robot that had the advantages of being human-like in motion capabilities, but clearly not human. Also I think a successful general purpose robot that was smaller than average human would appear less threatening. Naturally there will be a market for very realistic robots, but I think it will remain specialized.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. peanutbutter 01:17 PM 11/29/08

    Okay, here's how see it. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The "Data" character from the star trek series was a fan favorite, because he WAS very much human. In "Lost in Space" the robot looked very machine-like, but was accepted as a member of the crew or the family, because it sounded like a human or had human traits. We also seem to love animals that perform human behaviors. I believe humans do not like things that slither or crawl upon the floors or walls, much like bugs or snakes would. Think of "Robocop" or even "Terminator" The terminator was a bad guy but you liked it. In the old Jonny Quest cartoon series, They had a giant robot spider thing with one cycloptic eye, making for an unacceptable figure. It was evil because it didn't look human. You have to go back to early stories and early films to see other examples of what would be acceptable or unacceptable. In "The Day the Earth Stood Still" we are creeped out by Klatu, because he is formless. A straight flat body and head with no discerning characteritstics. He had no nose, eyes or mouth. No ears, hair, or knees. He was 'void' of any human features, therefore he was frightening. We need to study this subject more, dig deeper into what makes humans afraid of things that don't look like them, and why we love and trust things that do.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. sputuk 10:59 AM 11/30/08

    Anything which is just "slightly wrong" is inclined to induce unease. That isn't limited to appearance or behaviour of human analogues. The reason behind this is an obvious evolutionary advantageous trait too. eg becoming alert when a predator camoflague just fails to be indisguishiable to the background.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Sylvansights 08:02 PM 11/30/08

    Using hollywood footage is not an answer to me. We must remember that those people were payed to act in a certain way. Even if the robot creeps you out, a laugh track might tell you to feel other wise. I believe our inability to read the motives, especially in facially muscles and or body language causes some warning signal, and puts us on guard. Our genes say to kind to those of like and wary of those unlike. Robots don't wear jeans now thats creepy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Sylvansights 08:06 PM 11/30/08

    I don't think using hollywood footage is the answer. People in film are paid to portray an image regardless of their true feelings. A laugh track can tell you to accept some very creepy stuff. I think that the inability to determine motive through facial expression and body language are a big part of the creep factor.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Robot Cartoons--Cute; Robot Humans--Creepy: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X