Robot Space Plane Settles into Mystery Mission

The X-37B, a prototype space drone operated by the U.S. Air Force, is entering the third month of a classified space mission


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr



Stretching 29 feet in length and weighing 11,000 pounds, the second Boeing-built X-37B became the longest on-orbit space vehicle on June 16, 2012 when it completed a 469-day mission with an autonomous landing at Vandenberg Air Force Station in California. Image: Boeing

The U.S. Air Force's mysterious X-37B space plane is quietly chalking up mileage in space more than two months after its latest launch into orbit.

The robotic   X-37B space plane   soared into orbit atop an Atlas 5 rocket from Florida's Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Dec. 11. The mini-shuttle's mission is known as Orbital Test Vehicle-3 (OTV-3), since it is the third classified mission under the Air Force's X-37B program.

How long OTV-3 will remain in Earth orbit is unknown. The hush-hush   space plane   mission is officially on Air Force space tracking books as USA-240.

"The mission is ongoing," Air Force Maj. Eric Badger, a spokesman for the X-37B program, told SPACE.com. "As with previous missions, the actual duration will depend on test objectives, on-orbit vehicle performance and conditions at the landing facility." [Photos: U.S. Military's X-37B Space Plane]

 

A new reusable space plane

The current flight underway has attained one known major milestone — that of reusability.

This same vehicle was flown on the maiden voyage in the X-37B program back in 2010. That OTV-1 mission lasted nearly 225 days in orbit and then zoomed back to Earth on autopilot over the Pacific Ocean, gliding down onto a specially prepared runway at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

The OTV-2 mission, which used a different X-37B vehicle, also made a Vandenberg touchdown on June 16 of last year after remaining in orbit for 469 days, more than doubling its sister ship’s stay.

There's a possibility that OTV-3 may not land in Vandenberg. There have been discussions about bringing the space plane down at the space shuttle landing strip at NASA's   Kennedy Space Center, next door to Cape Canaveral, as a possible cost-cutting measure.

"The possibility of using the former shuttle infrastructure for future X-37B landing operations is still being investigated," Badger said.

Space test platform

The X-37B looks a bit like a miniature   space shuttle. The vehicle is 29 feet (8.8 meters) long and 15 feet (4.5 m) wide, with a payload bay about the size of a pickup truck bed.

Only two X-37B space planes have been constructed for the Air Force by Boeing Government Space Systems, officials say. Flights of the space plane are conducted under the auspices of the Air Force’s Rapid Capabilities Office.

According to an Air Force fact sheet, the Rapid Capabilities Office is working on the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle "to demonstrate a reliable, reusable, unmanned space test platform for the United States Air Force."

Mission control is handled by the 3rd Space Experimentation Squadron, 21st Space Wing, of the Air Force Space Command in Colorado Springs, Colo.

 

Skywatcher insight

While little is known regarding what OTV-3 is toting in its cargo bay, amateur skywatchers offer some insight into the mission.

"All does seem quiet," said Ted Molczan of Toronto, a leader in an ever-vigilant, worldwide satellite sleuthing network.

"OTV-3 remains in its initial orbit, maintaining altitude with periodic engine firings," Molczan told SPACE.com. "Unlike the first two missions, its ground track does not closely repeat at the frequent intervals that would suggest an imaging reconnaissance mission."


TechMediaNetwork

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. alan6302 03:02 PM 2/22/13

    It has the same mission as Moonraker.....depopulation/Agenda 21

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. WRQ9 03:51 PM 2/22/13

    N. Korean tectonics may have more than a little to do with new patterns in reconnaissance. I don't imagine there was much to analyze previously along those lines, nor would it bear repeating, at least for now.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. raoharsh 01:28 AM 2/24/13

    http://www.russianspaceweb.com/kliper.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. elderlybloke in reply to WRQ9 05:49 PM 2/24/13

    The North Koreans will have been under survelance by the umteen Spy Satellites that have orbiting for decades.

    What the Dear Leader had for Lunch will be known.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Nicholasunik 02:12 PM 2/27/13

    It's intriguing that US conservatives, who hate big government and big public spending, are lobbying for support of the Navy shipyards, and doubtless support most of the massive expenditure on the military or with military applications, like the X37, while the President is accused of neglecting industry and jobs. Big bad federal government is okay as long as its OUR big government? Okay, we ARE all thankful to the US taxpayer for protecting the free world, some of the time anyway.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Wayne Williamson 06:49 PM 2/28/13

    I think its all very interesting...
    Chances of guessing what they are up to are slim and none...
    My thoughts are...
    What is the power source they are using for the time periods its in orbit...solar or other.
    Great way to not leave debris in orbit or have it hit at random places when it does fall.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Robot Space Plane Settles into Mystery Mission

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X