Who Needs a Doctor When There's a Robot in the House, er, Hospital? [Slide Show]

A Florida trauma center tests the use of a mobile robot to deliver telemedicine















Share on Tumblr

robot, telemedicine, surgery View slideshow to see the RP-7 in action." data-pin-do="buttonBookmark">

THE RP-7: Doctors at the William Lehman Injury Research Center (WLIRC) in Miami are testing the ability of a robot to help them better care for patients when a doctor is not available. View slideshow to see the RP-7 in action. Image: Image courtesy of InTouch Technologies

Telemedicine has caught on over the past several years as an effective way to bring patients and specialists together via the magic of video conferencing. Unfortunately, most telemedicine setups require the patient to be in a room equipped with a computer, camera, microphone and monitor, so that specialists can remotely assess his or her condition. Could robots be the answer, providing both patient care and a view for specialists checking in from afar?

The William Lehman Injury Research Center (WLIRC) in Miami for a year has been experimenting with a budding type of telemedicine that uses a robot to let videoconferencing go mobile, allowing a specialist working from a remote location to see a patient (and for the patient to see the physician) from the moment he or she checks in for surgery through recovery.

A typical scenario would unfold as such: A patient is brought to the Ryder Trauma Center at the University of Miami's Jackson Memorial Hospital (where the WLIRC doctors work) by ambulance or helicopter. While the patient is en route, the trauma center checks to see if there is a specialist on site who can treat the patient's specific injuries. If there are none available and the specialist on call is unable to make it to Ryder in time, staff at the center wheel out the RP-7, made by InTouch Technologies, Inc., a Santa Barbara, Calif., medical robotics technology company. Once a specialist is located, he or she uses a laptop or PC to remotely connect via wireless broadband with the robot. After the connection is made, the specialist is able to control the robot's movement, possibly even meeting the patient at the door. From there, the specialist can autonomously drive the robot to operating rooms, intensive care units and patients' bedsides so he or she can monitor those patients as well as instruct nurses and residents.

View a slideshow of the RP-7 in action

The WLIRC doctors and physicians from the U.S. Army's Trauma Training Center (working at the Ryder Trauma Center) have been testing the RP-7, to see if the above scenario is realistic. The 200-pound, (90.7-kilogram) 67-inch- (1.7-meter-) tall metal medical man glides along on three spherical balls (rather than wheels) at a top speed of four miles (6.4 kilometers) per hour. As the Army's Web site points out, it "looks vaguely like one of the Daleks [robots] from Doctor Who with a view screen mounted on top."

Ryder is the only "level 1" trauma center in Miami–Dade County, which makes it difficult to find specialists to weigh in on all cases, particularly within the critical first 60 minutes after an injury, says Jeffrey Augenstein, WLIRC's director and the RP-7 project's principal investigator. "There is a shortage of trauma specialists in this country," he says. "You need to have a plan B to bring expertise from the outside to the point of care, where decisions often involve life and death."



6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. hotblack 09:20 PM 12/4/08

    Revenge of the Daleks

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Surfrider 11:35 AM 12/5/08

    The ability to put a patient in front of a specialist anywhere in the world is fantastic. The only possible barrier is the availability of high quality bandwidth at bedside. I've heard of a project in Montana that is using video and web conferencing to link frontier hospitals to specialists in metropolitan areas. They are using Nefsis (http://go.nefsis.com), but there are a number of products that can be used. Since video conferencing doesn't work well over a wireless link, I wonder how they are dealing with the bandwidth issue.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. thomasdebell 10:26 AM 12/10/08

    Great Now Doctors can just stay home and get paid.....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. ZenaV 03:19 PM 12/10/08

    Human beings do. I refuse health care from a robot.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Richard B. Boddie 08:01 PM 3/2/09

    I had the experience with the robot doctor at Fountain Valley Regional Hospital on February 4, 2009 in the ER when my wife was rushed there having had seizures at home. I never thought The Jetsons and Buck Rogers fictions would ever occur in my lifetime (being 70 now), but they have. I was quite surprised to speak with a doctor via robot that day in the midst of my stress and her trauma, but so relieved and thankful as a direct result of what they were able to do for us that day.

    Richard B. Boddie
    Huntington Beach, CA

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. paigeodad in reply to thomasdebell 11:58 PM 12/16/09

    yeah, you know we are by nature pretty lazy, 8 years of college, 4-7 years of residency working 80-120 hrs/ wk, then in the private world we work 12 hour days and are on call all night, your right we are just laying around and getting paid...............get real.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Who Needs a Doctor When There's a Robot in the House, er, Hospital? [Slide Show]

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X