Romney Would End Wind Energy Production Tax Credit (Costing US 37,000 Jobs)

  Staffers for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign say the candidate wants to end the wind production tax credit. That federal credit has allowed the wind industry to compete with heavily-subsidized fossil fuels that do considerable harm to the environment and public health -- impacts that are not reflected in their price.


CleanTechnica













Share on Tumblr

By Stephen Lacey

  Staffers for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign say the candidate wants to end the wind production tax credit. That federal credit has allowed the wind industry to compete with heavily-subsidized fossil fuels that do considerable harm to the environment and public health -- impacts that are not reflected in their price. The production tax credit [...]


CleanTechnica

What is CleanTechnica?
All CleanTechnica articles

Reprinted from Cleantechnica with permission from Green Options Media.


1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jafis 03:59 AM 10/27/12

    If an industry that has been in existence as long as wind-energy still depends on tax credits and rate-payer subsidies to survive, it has no right to continue to exist.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Romney Would End Wind Energy Production Tax Credit (Costing US 37,000 Jobs)

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X