Saving the Good, the Bad--And the Ugly [Slide Show]

A hyena might not be as adorable as a tiger cub or dolphin, but a few champions of nature's endangered ugly underdogs say the hideous are just as worthy of protection as the huggable















Share on Tumblr

ugly endangered species

NOT READY FOR A CLOSEUP: What happens when an animal that needs saving isn't as cute as a tiger cub? Some biologists explain why human aesthetic preference has played such a big role in protecting the panda--over stranger species like this one, the helmeted hornbill. Image: WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/DOUG JANSON

More In This Article

The bulbous purple burrowing frog may not have made it onto any awww-inspiring tote bags like the unequivocally adorable giant panda. But, an increasing number of people are arguing, the humble frog—and other more homely creatures—is at least equally worth rescuing from the brink of extinction.

One of those people is Nathan Yaussy, an ecology graduate student at Kent State University in Ohio and the creator of the EUTEndangered Ugly Things blog (recently profiled in The Washington Post). "My goal is just to let people know that these things are out there, and they're just as important as the panda," he says.

[Slide Show: 10 Ugly Animals That Need Help, Too]

A handful of animals that are easier on the eye than, say, the aye-aye, have gotten the lion's share of publicity, funds and legislation for their salvation. Many so-called "charismatic megafauna," which conservationists select as mascots—or "poster children", are chosen for their looks rather than their ecological importance, notes biologist David Stokes of the University of Washington in Bothell.

"If we could raise the ecological literacy of the public and our officials to see beyond the surface value of these animals to their ecological or even utilitarian role," Stokes says, "that would be really valuable." Many endangered insects may actually be more ecologically "important" than an affable Galápagos penguin. But biologists, he notes, often neglect to take preference into account.

Certainly looks can be a matter of personal preference, but the surefire way that an animal finds its way into the public's collective heart seems to be by having infantile qualities—big eyes, round face, wobbly gait (a phenomenon called neoteny). But, as Stokes found from his research [pdf], no hard-and-fast rule dictates which animals gain wide appeal: "Really tiny differences among species can have huge effects on how much appeal they have," he says. He studied a range of penguin species and found that those with patches of bright color received by far and away the most visual coverage.



7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. ramjee 11:27 PM 7/29/09

    Couldn't agree any better! There are several of these creatures like the seacucumber that's often ignored simply because they aren't as attractive as corals or seaanemones...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Business and Biodiversity Initiative 03:51 AM 7/30/09

    Good article - we've linked to it in our blog. The axolotl picture is great. The media bias is something we'll try to take into account.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. krabcat 07:05 PM 7/31/09

    how can you call the African wild dog ugly? i think it has beautiful coloration

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. waxwing 05:10 PM 8/3/09

    As Henry Beston once wrote,

    "For the animal shall not be measured by the man. In a world older and more complete than ours they move finished and more complete, gifted with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained, living by voices we shall never hear."

    Ugliness is in the mind of the beholder.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. cupsofteawithtoast 04:31 AM 8/20/09

    After researching endangered animals for a school project i was maddened by the fact that when looking up minke whales i found so much anti-whaling propaganda, yet when i googled, Orange Roughy i was swamped with recipes!!!
    Minke Whales aren't endangered whilst Orange Roughy are being seriously threatened by very dubious and detrimental local fishing practices.
    I am so glad that there are others out there that are similarly dismayed :)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. The Sixth 11:19 AM 8/21/09

    So is it better to kill vegetables for food than animals, just because they do not look cute or cannot cry out? Did you ever watch a vegetable cell under a microscope as it sqirms and finally explodes due to heat?
    One of my favorite songs is by Traffic "John Barleycorn Must Die".
    Vegetarians are among the greatest scientific idiots.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. cupsofteawithtoast 02:31 PM 8/21/09

    This isn't about vegetarianism, in my opinion you can receive your nutrients from animals, but we have a responsibility to be aware of the consequences of what we put on our plate, and not be persuaded by irrelevant emotional triggers

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Saving the Good, the Bad-- And the Ugly [Slide Show]

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X