Cover Image: June 2002 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Scaling the Quakes [Preview]

Why aftershocks may not really be aftershocks after all















Share on Tumblr

Aftermath

AFTERMATH: The devastation in Puli in central Taiwan, after a 7.3-magnitude earthquake and aftershocks on September 22, 1999. Image: ROBYN BECK, ©AFP/Corbis

According to conventional earthquake wisdom, aftershocks represent the ground's "relaxing" after the main temblor has rattled the land. But researchers in Britain report that, statistically speaking, aftershocks are no different from main shocks.

Physicists Per Bak, Kim Christensen, Leon Danon and Tim Scanlon of Imperial College London mapped more than 330,000 earthquakes that struck California between 1984 and 2000. They found that all the quakes obeyed a single underlying scaling law, a mathematical relation that gives the statistical spread of events for a given area and magnitude. According to this law, earthquakes cluster in the same way at a range of timescales, from tens of seconds to tens of years. So from a wide enough perspective, an aftershock could come years after a primary event.


This article was originally published with the title Scaling the Quakes.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Scaling the Quakes: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X