Key Concepts
- Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on.
- Proponents say these “open access” practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore more productive.
- Critics say scientists who put preliminary findings online risk having others copy or exploit the work to gain credit or even patents.
- Despite pros and cons, Science 2.0 sites are beginning to proliferate; one notable example is the OpenWetWare project started by biological engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Editor's Note: This article was originally an "Edit This" column which sought reader feedback before print publication, for the original version of the story please click here.
More to Explore
-
Overview
Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk? -
Overview
Discuss This Article
More from the Magazine
May
2008 Issue- News Scan Are Personal Genome Scans Medically Useless?
- Forum We Need More Novels about Real Scientists
- News Scan This Is Your Mom on Drugs: Aging Doesn't Stop Drug Use
- Buy the Digital Edition
The first generation of World Wide Web capabilities rapidly transformed retailing and information search. More recent attributes such as blogging, tagging and social networking, dubbed Web 2.0, have just as quickly expanded people’s ability not just to consume online information but to publish it, edit it and collaborate about it—forcing such old-line institutions as journalism, marketing and even politicking to adopt whole new ways of thinking and operating.
Science could be next. A small but growing number of researchers (and not just the younger ones) have begun to carry out their work via the wide-open tools of Web 2.0. And although their efforts are still too scattered to be called a movement—yet—their experiences to date suggest that this kind of Web-based “Science 2.0” is not only more collegial than traditional science but considerably more productive.
Read Comments (22) | Post a comment
RSS Feeds
Blog
Podcasts
Mobile
Widgets