Science Goes to the Movies
An unusual concentration
of science fact
graces the silver screen
By
Corey S. Powell
 |
| FIRST LOOK PICTURES
Matthew Broderick (right) as Richard Feynman arrives at Los
Alamos to work on the Manhattan Project. |
Mainstream movies are usually not very kind to science--witness the implausible and sinister behavior of the tornadoes in
Twister or the secretive ineptitude of the government researchers in
Independence Day. So it is a pleasant
surprise to see two thoughtful, scientifically literate films--
Infinity and
Microcosmos--now going
head-to-head with the likes of
The First Wives Club.
Infinity--a biography of the late physicist
Richard Feynman--is in some respects the more unusual of the two. It stars Matthew Broderick and Patricia Arquette, both
well-known Hollywood actors. But the subject is not the usual Hollywood fare:
Infinity concerns Feynman's
childhood and early adult years, focusing on his work on the Manhattan Project and on his relationship with his first wife,
Arline, who died of tuberculosis at a young age. The result is a curious hybrid, part an account of the making of a scientist, part
morality tale and part tragic romance.
The screenplay for Infinity derives from chapters in Feynman's two
best-selling books of reminiscences, Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman! and What Do You Care What
Other People Think?. To the credit of Broderick (who directed as well), the movie hews quite closely to its source. The
early sections showing how Richard's father, Melville, fostered his youthful curiosity offer a rare, perceptive look at a
budding scientific mind. In one touching scene, the young Richard asks his father why when he pulls his wagon forward, the
ball sitting in the wagon rolls to the back. Melville Feynman responds with a serious discussion of inertia and explains--quite
accurately--that we know what inertia does, but nobody knows at the deepest level what it is. Later, Richard tries to explain
to his father how an electron can emit a photon even though the photon was not "really" there before. These well-drawn
exchanges eloquently express the way a scientist views the world.
 |
The real, 24-year old Richard Feynman (center) with his colleagues
at Los Alamos. |
Unfortunately,
Infinity is limited by Broderick's
excessive reverence for his subject. Feynman's reminiscences, which appeared in print 40 years after the fact, are tinged with
longing and arrogant pride but carefully do not reveal too much emotion. The movie, too, feels oddly remote. As a child
Feynman had an almost pathological fear of being seen as a "sissy"; the emotional trauma of Arline's death and the moral
conundrum of working on the Manhattan Project surely figured into his later, carefully cultivated madcap persona. But
Infinity offers only sporadic glimpses of Feynman's inner turmoil. There is little sign of the dark restlessness that led
him to crack safes at Los Alamos or bang on the bongos long into the night.
Infinity does not attempt a
comprehensive overview of Feynman's life and work. You will not see his work on quantum electrodynamics (which netted
him a Nobel Prize in 1965), his groundbreaking ideas about what we now call "quarks," or his theory of superfluidity. You will
not witness his brushes with anti-Semitism or his often abusive treatment of women. (First Look Pictures has helpfully placed
some additional information about Feynman on the Infinity Web site.) What you will see is an intriguing, if somewhat
romanticized, portrait of the scientist as a young man
Comments
Add Comment