Scientists Find Soft Tissue in T. rex Fossil















Share on Tumblr

dino bone

Image: SCIENCE

Dinosaur fossils are rare finds. But the 70-million-year-old bones of a Tyrannosauraus rex recovered from Montana are proving to be even more exceptional than the usual dino remains. Researchers report today in the journal Science that they have recovered soft tissue, including blood vessels, from the ancient creature.

Mary Schweitzer of North Carolina State University and her colleagues studied T. rex remains recovered in 2003 from a quarry in the Charles M. Russell Wildlife Preserve that date to roughly 70 million years ago. The specimen, known as MOR 1125 or B-rex, includes a 107-centimeter-long femur bone. Studying the bones in the lab, the team treated part of the femur with a solution designed to dissolve its mineral components. The substance left behind was a stretchy material that showed blood vessels, bone-building cells known as osteocytes and other organic features when observed under a microscope.

The researchers then compared the material to structures found in the bones of ostriches, because living birds are the closest relatives to dinosaurs available for study. They report similarities in both the branching of the blood vessels and the presence of reddish brown dots, which could be nuclei from endothelial cells that line blood vessels. "Our preliminary research shows that antibodies that recognize collagen [the fibrous protein constituent of bone] react to chemical extracts of this fossil bone, " Schweitzer says. "If further studies confirm this, we may have the potential to learn more not only about the dinosaurs themselves, but also about how and why they were preserved in the first place."



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. lonespiritwolf 11:05 PM 11/22/07

    I found some strange looking rocks in 1985, in big marine lake, washington county, minnesota. I would like to email you a pitcher of the strangest one I have ever seen or heard of. It looks like the ovum and sperm cell of a very large mammal, on a not possible large scale. please let me know who to send it to. My name is Leo Mueller, email address is Muellermrn@aol.com thank you for your time.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. frankcott11221 11:14 AM 7/20/08

    I find it very doubtful that tissue can be preserved for 70,000000 years, is it possible the the T-Rex is younger?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. AMDG4E in reply to frankcott11221 01:22 PM 8/17/11

    Yes, it most certainly can be shown to be younger -- much, much younger! See my two posts at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=blood-from-stone&posted=1#comments which explain how simple C-14 dating tests on dinosaur bones have consistently shown them to be thousands, not millions of years old. Mainstream science is stunningly quiet on this issue because they know it would be a major blow to their evolution frogs to princes fairy tale.

    James B. Phillips

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in T. rex Fossil

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X