Field Notes: A Visit to an Early Human Death Trap [Videos and Slide Show]

Could a recently discovered species from South Africa be the ancestor of us all?














Share on Tumblr



Image: Kate Wong

More In This Article

In late November 2011 I went to Johannesburg, South Africa, to meet the newest member of the human family, a nearly two million–year-old creature dubbed Australopithecus sediba. First announced in 2010, its fossilized bones have caused quite a commotion in paleoanthropological circles—and with good reason. They are some of the most complete early hominins (the group that includes modern humans and their extinct relatives) ever found, and they exhibit a combination of apelike and humanlike traits that no one would have predicted. Think ape arm with human hand, ape heelbone adjoining human anklebone. In the cover story of the April issue, I describe the unexpected discovery of the fossils and explore the latest thinking on where Australopithecus sediba fits in our family tree. Paleoanthropologist Lee Berger of the University of the Witwatersrand, who found the fossils, thinks A. sediba could be the ancestor of our genus, Homo; other scientists disagree. Here's a short video of Berger talking about one of the two most complete skeletons from the site. The story continues below it.

» View a slide show of my snapshots of Australopithecus sediba and the Malapa site

The phylogenetic position of Australopithecus sediba is important, because scientists have been sorely lacking for evidence of how Homo got its start. But the new find is enormously important no matter how it is related to us, because it has the potential to tell scientists more than they have ever been able to glean previously about a hominin from this time period. Not only are the hominins exceptionally complete and abundant, but the site seems to have preserved some very unusual things, including, probably, skin and perhaps other organic material as well. 

Berger is bringing all the resources he can muster to bear on the project. Thus far the team is more than 80 persons strong and counting. Some are specialists in particular areas of hominin anatomy, some are studying the nonhuman animals from the site, some are analyzing plant remains, some are working on the potential organics. Geologists, geochemists and imaging experts are also involved. Berger is building a structure at the site to protect it and serve as a laboratory when formal excavation of the site gets under way later this year, at which point he expects to finds loads more fossils.

 I spent a week in Johannesburg, talking with Berger, and a number of the other members of the team. And I was able to, on two occasions, visit the site where A. sediba was found, called Malapa, 40 kilometers northwest of Johannesburg in the greater Cradle of Humankind area that fossil hunters have trawled for decades. Here are some videos of Berger showing the limestone miners’ pit where the skeletons were found, as well as areas of the site where he can see hominin bone peeking out of the ground—remains that the team will collect during excavation.

 

 

It was so incredibly exciting to see the hominin fossils still in the ground waiting to be unearthed—and to consider what else might be hiding in the fossil-rich sediments at Malapa. So stay tuned. This is the it site of the moment, and by all appearances there is so much more to come.

» View a slide show of my snapshots of Australopithecus sediba and the Malapa site


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. DABurack 04:16 PM 3/23/12

    Dr, Berger,

    These are such very interesting articles and images for us neophytes. Thank you for sharing this tremendously intriguing research.

    I have a question, as to why you are ranging so far afield for future research, including the Congo. As an admittedly naive armchair archaeologist, I admit to having had a long-standing prejudice toward looking more closely at (today's) more humid West Africa, its coasts and greatest rivers, even though (or because) they aren't in accord with theory that humans would be forged out of the more arid and sparse environment of East Africa, as intuitively appealing as that might be. West Africa is where today's greatest concentrations of humans and primates exist-- as well as research conditions less pleasant that pioneer archaeolgists enjoyed in the northern Rift Valley; let's face it, who wanted to dig in the muck of a hot, humid, insect-infested jungle? Would you or have you shared your thinking along these lines?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. DABurack 04:29 PM 3/23/12

    I guess that I should have mentioned my gratitude to Katie Wong, my very favorite science journalist on all things human history!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. knightmage 04:13 PM 3/26/12

    Judging from the appearance of the scull shown here all the creatures found in that particular spot may have been victims of an ancient pyroclastic flow.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Diesel67 in reply to knightmage 03:51 PM 3/27/12

    The scull? Maybe they were time travelers from a collegiate rowing team. But the waters around South Africa are kind of treacherous for sculling, no?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Diesel67 03:52 PM 3/27/12

    If you're going to put on a slide show, put on a slide show. I neither need nor want your freaking commeercials.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Field Notes: A Visit to an Early Human Death Trap [Videos and Slide Show]

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X