Cover Image: August 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Shading Illusions: How 2-D Becomes 3-D in the Mind

Light cues influence the brain's processing of depth














Share on Tumblr



The brain automatically assembles fragments of similar color, enabling you to easily spot the lion behind the foliage. Image: Mitsuaki Iwago/Minden Pictures

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

The visual image is inherently ambiguous: an image of a person on the retina would be the same size for a dwarf seen from up close or a giant viewed from a dis­tance. Perception is partly a matter of using certain assumptions about the world to resolve such ambiguities. We can use illusions to uncover what the brain’s hidden rules and assumptions are. In this column, we consider illusions of shading.

In illustration a, the disks are ambiguous; you can see either the top row as ­con­vex spheres or “eggs,” lit from the left, and the bottom row as cavities—or vice ver­sa. This observation reveals that the vi­sual centers in the brain have a built-in sup­position that a single light source illuminates the entire image, which makes sense given that we evolved on a planet with one sun. By consciously shif­ting the light source from left to right, you can make the eggs and cavities switch places.

In illustration b, the image is even more compelling. Here the disks that are light on the top always look like eggs, and the ones that are light on the bottom are cavities. So we have uncovered another premise used by the visual system: it expects light to shine from above. You can verify this by turning the page upside down. All the eggs and cavities instantly switch places.

Amazingly, the brain’s assumption that light shines from above the head is preserved even when you rotate your head 180 degrees. Ask a friend to hold this page right side up for you. Then bend down and look between your legs at the page behind you. You will find that, again, the switch occurs, as if the sun is stuck to your head and shining upward from the floor. Signals from your body’s center of balance—the vestibu­lar system—guided by the positions of little stones in your ears called otoliths, travel to your visual centers to correct your picture of the world (so that the world continues to look upright) but do not correct for the location of the sun.

From this experiment we learn that despite the impression of seamless unity, vision is actually mediated by multiple parallel information-processing modules in the brain. Some of the modules connect to the vestibular system; however, the one that handles shape from shading does not. The reason might be that correcting an image for placement in so-called world-centered coordinates would be too computationally expensive and take too much time. Our ancestors generally kept their heads upright, so the brain could get away with this shortcut (or simplifying assumption). That is, our progenitors were able to raise babies to maturity often enough that no selection pressure acted to produce vestibular correction.

If you look at illustration c, you find that you can almost instantly mentally group all the eggs and segregate them from the cavities. As visual scientists discovered decades ago, only certain elementary features that are extracted early during visual processing “pop out” conspicuously and can be grouped in this manner. For example, your brain can discern a set of red dots in a background of green ones but cannot group smiles scat­tered among a backdrop of frowns. Color is thus a primitive feature that is extracted early, whereas a smile is not.

(It makes survival sense to be able to piece together fragments of similar color. A lion hidden behind a screen of green leaves is visible merely as gold fragments, but the visual brain assembles the pieces into a single, gold, lion-shaped form and warns: “Get out of here!” On the other hand, objects are not made up of smiles.)

The fact that you can group the eggs in c implies that shading information, like color, is extracted early in visual processing. This prediction was verified in recent years by recording activity in the neurons of monkeys and by conducting brain-imaging experiments in humans. Certain cells in the visual cortex fire when the observer sees eggs; others respond only to cavities. In illustration d, where the circles have the same luminance polarities as in c, you cannot perceive the grouping; this fact suggests the importance of perceived depth as a cue that is extracted early in visual processing.


10 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jtallcott 10:03 AM 8/2/08

    I cannot find any way to view the illustrations. What good is this article without them?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. JoanDenoo 07:16 PM 8/14/08

    I don't see where else to sign up.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. JoanDenoo 07:18 PM 8/14/08

    I still don't see the illustrations.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. JoanDenoo 07:19 PM 8/14/08

    I still do not see the illustrations.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. kanikarautji 03:43 AM 9/3/08

    neither do i

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. kanikarautji 03:46 AM 9/3/08

    i cant see the illustrations. i have already subscribed for scientific american india edition,do i still need to pay for the digital issue in order to read the various articles present online?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. nousername 08:58 AM 9/17/08

    whiat is abcdseeing is believing

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. SourPuss 12:33 PM 9/17/08

    I see them just fine, they are just JPGs. Turn off your pop-up blockers.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. SciAmTodd 01:03 PM 9/17/08

    OK everyone, the visuals are there and accessible/viewable. Obviously you have user, software, hardware, plug-in, or some other issue...other than this article.
    GREAT ARTICLE!!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. skass 11:49 PM 9/17/08

    To see the illustrations, click on the blue word "illustration" where each is mentioned. If for some reason you have no links, here are the illustration URLs:
    http://www.sciam.com/media/inline/2008-09-17_dots1.jpg
    http://www.sciam.com/media/inline/2008-09-17_dots2.jpg
    http://www.sciam.com/media/inline/2008-09-17_dots3.jpg
    http://www.sciam.com/media/inline/2008-09-17_dots4.jpg

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Shading Illusions: How 2-D Becomes 3-D in the Mind: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X