In September a driverless Audi TTS will speed to the top of Colorado's Pikes Peak at just under 100 kilometers per hour—that's right, no driver. It is an early step toward a robo-car that can drive itself, perhaps better than you can.

The World Health Organization projects traffic fatalities to be the third leading cause of mortality worldwide by 2020. And drivers themselves are responsible for 73 percent of these deaths. So automakers are looking at ways they could make cars safer by taking driving out of human hands. Self-driving cars could offer other benefits: TNO, an international research firm based in the Netherlands, says that they could reduce the time lost to traffic jams by up to 50 percent, and reduce CO2 emissions and fuel consumption by 5 percent.

The Pikes Peak run is a joint project of the Stanford University Dynamic Design Laboratory, the Electronics Research Lab (ERL) for the Volkswagen Group (which owns Audi), and software-maker Oracle Corp. The rough, part-gravel road to the top of Pikes Peak is the route of the annual International Hill Climb rally, an annual auto and motorcycle race. The TTS run will demonstrate whether the car can take curves as fast as a human driver—without driving off a cliff.

The U.S. Department of Defense has been testing autonomous vehicles for years, in particular through its November 2007 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Urban Challenge at the decommissioned George Air Force Base in Victorville, Calif. During the contest, driverless cars needed to successfully navigate an urbanlike 96-kilometer course (complete with traffic merges and stop signs) in less than six hours. Only six of 11 teams were able to accomplish this, and another ERL vehicle, a Volkswagen Passat named "Junior", came in second.

"After the Urban Challenge, we started to discuss the next big challenge, which was autonomous driving up to the speed limits," says Burkhard Huhnke, ERL's executive director. Ideally, the vehicle will accomplish the kind of drifting, fast turns that race car drivers make.

The car's sporty hatchback houses two computers in its trunk, both using Oracle's Java Real-Time System to run algorithms that keep the car on the road and at the limits of its handling ability on the varying surfaces and conditions.

"It's a lane-keeping assistance system we developed with supporting regular drivers in mind, coupled with a robotic driver that's continually trying to push the car to the limits," says Chris Gerdes, director of the Center for Automotive Research at Stanford. The thinking is that a self-driving car would have to be as good as a professional race car driver for normal folks to accept it.

The car will be guided by a differential GPS system that corrects errors arising in global positioning satellite signals as they travel through the ionosphere and troposphere. It is exact enough to keep the car within 1.5 centimeters of its course. A similar technology is in the pilot stage for national deployment by the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration, although the crew is using an off-the-shelf radio transmitter to broadcast exact location data to be used for the corrections.

The autonomous vehicle
There are several components to what the auto industry calls autonomous driving. First, the car must be able to distinguish things in its environment, such as roads, buildings, intersections and other cars. Second, it needs to be able to avoid collisions. Beyond these basics, an intelligent vehicle would obey the rules of the road while getting to the destination as quickly and safely as possible. The Pikes Peak run will test the Audi's ability to meet this goal.

Some of these capabilities have already hit the street, and others have been demonstrated in tests. For example, in Europe Volkswagen Passats can park themselves, and collision warning is available in high-end models from most major manufacturers, including Toyota, Mercedes and Volvo.

The University of Oxford is working on an autonomous navigation system that takes in information from onboard sensors, radar, cameras, lasers and Internet servers. And GM envisions a system called the Mobility Internet that connects intelligent cars to each other and to remote servers in a vast, moving peer-to-peer network that would let them travel efficiently and in sync. Someday, autonomous driving could offer the ultimate in comfort, letting the driver chat on the phone, e-mail or watch TV on the way to work. How much control you want to turn over to the car may depend on your age and where you are going, according to Marcial Hernandez, senior engineer at ERL. "On vacation with the family, the driver may want to turn around and talk to the kids. People in their 30s may want to drive to San Francisco, stop in front of the bar, and tell the car to go park itself."

Says Huhnke, "Taking the fun out of the driving is not our main goal—we'd like to help people enjoy driving. But they should make the decision if they want to drive or press the autopilot button."

18 Comments

1. 1. wolfkiss 12:26 PM 8/12/10

   KIT, go get me a cheeseburger and make it snappy...

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. Tophe 12:52 PM 8/12/10

   John, the robots attacked my car.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. cornelius 01:43 PM 8/12/10

   They should also start thinking about the security side of this. Imagine the future headlines: "Family kidnapped with the help of autonomous vehicle hackers".

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. anadventurer 04:43 PM 8/12/10

   Imagine this works very well right until the data input overwhelms the tolerances of the space dimensional mapping software. In other words, the car probably works well until there is too much going on and the computer brain can't cope.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

5. 5. JamesDavis 04:55 PM 8/12/10

   I wish Chrysler would hurry up and get that little electric four passenger, three wheeled jammy on the streets that can drive itself. They would need about two million on them in America so they will be in every city. Then I could call one up, have it come over and take these damn kids to school...I'm always late getting them there and the ol'lady is always whining at me.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

6. 6. ZippyDiDoDaah 06:46 PM 8/12/10

   Given that humans don't multi-task any better than computers, making all new cars robotic ought to be a net positive: You can talk, text and drink to your heart's content since you're not the one driving . . . Oh, what frabjous joy ;-)

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

7. 7. jack.123 07:32 PM 8/12/10

   To bad almost nobody will be able to afford it.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

8. 8. donnert 09:07 PM 8/12/10

   I expect it to be a $3000 -$5000 option considering that the self parking models available now cost only $700 more.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

9. 9. robert schmidt 09:11 PM 8/12/10

   @jack.123, computing horsepower is relatively cheap compared to the cost of the engine and assembly. Remember, computers started out the size of office floors and cost many millions. Now you can buy one for under a thousand with many orders of magnitude more power than those early machines. It was estimated that if could take a top of the line computer from today back ten years it would be worth over a million dollars. Get with the digital age! Every two years capacity doubles and prices half. Soon self driving cars will be standard.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

10. 10. braz50 02:52 PM 8/13/10

    Old joke about self-flying airplane. Right after takeoff, the intercom comes on telling the passengers about the new technology... and finally concluding, "So relax, folks. Nothing can go wrong... go wrong... go wrong..."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

11. 11. jack.123 05:18 PM 8/13/10

    it's not the computer,but the insurance cost till the technology is proven.I doubt that most will cover it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

12. 12. jdoniach 07:39 PM 8/13/10

    93 People Killed Yesterday
    
    And the day before, and the day before that, in traffic accidents. Last year there were 33,963 traffic fatalities in the United States. The cost to society must be measured in billions of dollars, not to mention the suffering of those who have lost loved ones.
    
    My vision of the future includes robot-driven electric vehicles owned by organizations such as Zipcars, or, heaven forbid, municipalities. These vehicles would station themselves robotically at various locations, with inductive pick-ups to charge the batteries. When a car is needed, you would reserve it via computer, and, at the appointed hour, the closest appropriately sized vehicle would drive itself to your location, take you to your destination, then go and park itself at the closest charging point, waiting for the next assignment.
    
    --Joe

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

13. 13. jdoniach 07:40 PM 8/13/10

    93 People Killed Yesterday
    And the day before, and the day before that, in traffic accidents. Last year there were 33,963 traffic fatalities in the United States. The cost to society must be measured in billions of dollars, not to mention the suffering of those who have lost loved ones.
    
    My vision of the future includes robot-driven electric vehicles owned by organizations such as Zipcars, or, heaven forbid, municipalities. These vehicles would station themselves robotically at various locations, with inductive pick-ups to charge the batteries. When a car is needed, you would reserve it via computer, and, at the appointed hour, the closest appropriately sized vehicle would drive itself to your location, take you to your destination, then go and park itself at the closest charging point, waiting for the next assignment.
    
    --Joe

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

14. 14. Neptunerover 02:53 AM 8/14/10

    Eventually we will have completely computer controlled traffic. Towers located around the roadways will be able to triangulate the position of any vehicle and efficiently move each one to its destination. You just get in your car and tell it where you want to go. Highway stop-ups will be a thing of the past. No need for stop signs and red lights and inefficient driving, as a computer will modulate all traffic and make sure that nothing crashes into anything else while it keeps everything zipping along and getting to where it needs to go way better than this stupid 'every man for himself' system we have now.
    Letting people control these deadly weapons on their own will be a thing of the past, remembered mainly for its barbarianism.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

15. 15. andreanis 03:37 PM 8/14/10

    gosh amazing tool--------however how safe is it ?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

16. 16. u r all nerds 11:01 AM 8/17/10

    didnt you nerds see iRobot

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

17. 17. jabailo 06:26 PM 8/19/10

    My observation is that this technology should be marketable in say, 10 years. Yet, almost no long term "transportation infrastructure" blueprint takes account that we may have independently run, auto-pilot taxis available to all...instead of just buses and rail.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

18. 18. fgaudreau 05:19 PM 8/22/10

    Side mirrors on a self-driven car. Creepy!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this