Interactive Features | Technology

Shaping Up: 10 Engineering and Design Facts about One World Trade Center [Infographic]

What was once called the Freedom Tower should soon become the tallest building in the U.S. It will also be among the best prepared in the nation for a terrorist attack or other emergency



 

Interactive by Krista Fuentes. One WTC photo courtesy Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

13 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Griffmaster_01 09:43 AM 9/9/11

    I'm proud to see the progress being built into this tower.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. SparkEspanol 12:29 PM 9/9/11

    Great American!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. nfiertel 05:27 PM 9/9/11

    The technology of safety is of course very advanced but the look of the main building is..well..boring..the kind of design that would have been created by a committee finding compromise. Consider all the fantastic skyscrapers in other countries from the Middle East to Asia and this building in the city that invented the genre is..lacking.. Too late but also too bad.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. santaidm 08:45 PM 9/9/11

    I am NOT impressed ! But I think there are lots of other more interesting features but they just won't tell.
    BTW, why would a magazine publisher need 20 stories in what will certainly be the most expensive square footage in the US if not in the world. Stay put SciAm!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. fisixisfun 09:29 PM 9/9/11

    As far as security against 9/11 style airline attacks, that's easy: just mount some surface-to-air missiles on the 80th or 90th floor of the tallest building in the area (or a few of the tallest if in a dense area like Manhattan). Let's see someone try to crash a plane into a building then.
    Oh, and before you give me any crap about shooting down a civilian aircraft, remember: every single person on the plane will die when it hits the building, guaranteed. Those people are dead the moment the plane is hijacked and they discover they can't retake it, the only question is how many outside the plane will die.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. bsmith51 in reply to santaidm 11:20 PM 9/9/11

    Actually, the World Trade Center offers a cheaper solution for office space compared to offices in Midtown (where Conde Nast currently resides). Midtown is the most expensive, downtown is not. This is why so many companies are interested in moving downtown.

    http://www.wtc.com/news/the-rebirth-of-downtown-new-yorks-business-district

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. bsmith51 in reply to nfiertel 11:25 PM 9/9/11

    What are your opinions of the original towers then? Their design was even more basic. Honestly, I'm glad they didn't go crazy with the design, because it would look out of place in the New York Skyline. This is classic and beautiful. Sometimes the simplicity of something makes it better.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Alvin Phee 04:01 PM 9/10/11

    I am particularly impressed!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Sharknet 10:19 PM 9/10/11

    I am not impressed at all. What you have here is a structure just like every other structure. There is a thicker than average concrete core (that still would not stand up to a comercial jet plane smashing into it), a 15 meter blast wall on 2 of 4 sides, and an extra stair well that, when smashed by a plane, will be completely useless. Most, if not all, new major construction projects are LEED certified, so that's nothing to write home about either. This is just another tall building that's no different that the rest. You Americans have to stop, look around, and realize that you are no longer 1st at everything. The USA has long been surpassed in skyscraper construction, engineering, and design. This building has no significance in the world of skyscrapers other than the address.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Sharknet 10:36 PM 9/10/11

    Please do not interpret my last comment as any kind of disrespect to those that were affected by the events on 9/11/2001. That was not my intent. The long and short is that I fully expcted a Pheonix to rise from the ashes and what I see here is more like a sparrow.
    Regards,
    Sharknet (Aaron)
    One of your freindly neighbours to the north.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. Swiss422 in reply to Sharknet 03:32 AM 9/11/11

    "You are no longer 1st at everything. The USA has long been surpassed in skyscraper construction, engineering, and design."

    Hmmm. Let's see. Tallest building in the world, the Burj Khalifa. Architecture and engineering by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill of Chicago, with Adrian Smith as chief architect and Bill Baker as chief structural engineer.

    You can sit down now.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. alan6302 11:54 AM 9/11/11

    If my interpretation of the "tower of BAbel" story is correct, this is the tower.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. Zeoxy in reply to fisixisfun 06:36 AM 11/11/12

    oh, well how about this crap. Your proposing that we shoot down a civilian aircraft over a huge city, not only killing everyone on-board but also many people on the ground and no doubt causing millions of $ in damages across the city.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Shaping Up: 10 Engineering and Design Facts about One World Trade Center [Infographic]

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X