Sharing the Wealth (of Knowledge): Cumulative Cultural Development May Be Exclusively Human

Studies suggest that cumulative culture is unique to people, and that collaborative learning may be the key to human advancement. But precisely where to draw the lines for culture remains unclear















Share on Tumblr

Furthermore, de Waal believes that there is already evidence for cumulative culture in chimpanzees, such as populations that create and use tools for cracking nuts and extracting termites. "It is hard to imagine that chimpanzees socially learn these more complex behaviors without first learning more basic forms," de Waal says.

Laland, for his part, is concerned that the evidence for culture in nonhuman species is still circumstantial. The innovations are basic enough that it does not rule out the possibility these tools developed separately rather than building on one another. One species, Laland concedes, has unusually persuasive evidence: the New Caledonian crow, an animal far away from humans in evolutionary terms. The species, which like the western scrub jay is a member of the Corvidae family, makes tools by shaping pandanus tree leaves to forage for insects in wood. A survey of these tools has revealed three distinct designs, and the geographic overlap in their use suggests they did not evolve independently but may have been created by modifying one form of tool into another—evidence for cumulative culture.

The crow example may seem primitive when compared with the technical achievements of humans. Yet it raises questions about the capabilities involved, how they evolved and how many animals might possess these capacities. If nothing else, it reminds us that we are looking at a spectrum of abilities—and the differences, as Darwin suggested, are more likely to be of degree than kind.



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Dr. Strangelove 10:55 PM 3/14/12

    Cultural development, cumulative learning, verbal and symbolic communication. It all boil down to big brain and superior intelligence. We have a three-pound brain that consumes 25 watts of power. A quarter of our calorie intake goes to the brain.

    No animal can match our brain size and brain power relative to body size. And the effect of a big brain is dramatic. If you have a two-pound brain, you walk upright and maybe discover fire. If you have a three-pound brain, you fly the space shuttle and invent the world wide web.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Sharing the Wealth (of Knowledge): Cumulative Cultural Development May Be Exclusively Human

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X