Cover Image: December 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

A Silent Goat Outwits a Talking MD

Some unusual things have been entering and exiting human mouths















Share on Tumblr

goat and lawyer, lawyer, goat, outwit, man-bites-dog, dog-bites-man

Image: Matt Collins

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

Journalists are always on the lookout for what's called the man-bites-dog story, that is, a reversal of the ordinary order of things. Now, you're correct if you think this theme seems familiar because we also discussed the man-bites-dog concept in this space in the February issue. Back then, the subject was animals that got the upper hand—well, hoof, paw or claw, really—on humans who were hunting them.

I am compelled to revisit man-bites-dog now because on September 26, police in Pembroke, Ontario, arrested a man for biting a dog. An eyewitness summed up the scene thusly to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation: “It was messed up.” Despite the man's apparently best efforts, the dog—a pit bull, no less—suffered only minor injuries.

When I last checked, both the man and the dog were in the custody of the relevant health care experts. In the unlikely event that the biter was found to be in full possession of his faculties, he could wind up in court on animal cruelty charges. While the innocent dog, as it were, walks.

Legal cases involving humans and animals have a long history. As was also mentioned in my earlier column, animals were routinely brought up on charges back in the Middle Ages—a concept prefaced by the line, “Sure, charging an animal with a crime seems loony now.” Nevertheless, in January 2009 police in Nigeria did hold a goat “on suspicion of attempted armed robbery,” according to a Reuters report.

The goat was ratted out to the police by people who said it was really a human “armed robber who had used black magic to transform himself into a goat to escape arrest after trying to steal a Mazda 323.” This therianthropy (hey, we're a science magazine) turned out not to be much of a plan, seeing as he/it wound up under arrest anyway.

If one reads between the lines of the published account, however, one suspects that the cops were really protecting the goat from some citizens who maintain a belief in witchcraft. As police spokesman Tunde Mohammed told Reuters, “We cannot confirm the story, but the goat is in our custody. We cannot base our information on something mystical. It is something that has to be proved scientifically, that a human being turned into a goat.”

Tunde Mohammed thus stands in shining contrast to one Paul Broun. Just one day after the Ontario dog biter made his case to receive free Canadian government mental health care, Broun, a medical doctor, also started foaming at the mouth. On September 27, Broun told the attendees of a sportsman's banquet at the Liberty Baptist Church in Hartwell, Ga.: “All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and big bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell. And it's lies to try to keep me and all the folks who are taught that from understanding that they need a savior.”

Broun also put forth the notion that Earth is 9,000 years old. But that is just silly—in the 1600s Bishop James Ussher figured out that Earth was created the night before October 23, 4004 B.C. None of this would be any of my possibly literally damned business if not for the fact that Broun serves in the U.S. Congress and sits on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology—where he presumably interprets climate data from ice core samples that date back more than 9,000 years as a trick by Satan. To which I would respond, well, how can you get ice from the pit of hell, huh? QED.

By the time you read this, the representative from Georgia will have been reelected to his seat, since he was running unopposed. I am confident Broun cannot be turned into a goat, but can he at least be moved to a committee where his antediluvian, ahem, views are less likely to impede progress? I tell you, this stuff makes me biting mad.

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN ONLINE
Comment on this article at ScientificAmerican.com/dec2012



This article was originally published with the title Tongue Twisters.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Steve Mirsky has been writing the Anti Gravity column since Derek Jeter had a total of 12 base hits in the major leagues. He also hosts the Scientific American podcast Science Talk.


Rights & Permissions

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. cdome 10:56 AM 11/22/12

    Steve:

    If you believe Dante's Inferno to be an accurate description of hell, it is perfectly possible to obtain ice from there :-)

    Chuck in Tavares, FL

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Mike.A.Schwab 08:33 AM 12/4/12

    I believe his comments inspired a few thousand write in votes for Charles Darwin.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. bloomingdedalus 10:08 AM 12/4/12

    Let me make something very clear. I not only believe in Evolution, but I also am adamantly atheist until presented with legitimate, unequivocal information otherwise.

    That being said, Christianity, as presented by Jesus of Nazareth in the Gospels is far more progressive than almost any other ideological system I've encountered.

    So, will the fact that this man claims the world is 7000 years old "impede progress?" It is possible, given the committee he is on, however, you also must accept the fact that he is a licensed physician and the area he represents is the kind that only elects people who say stupid things like that. And, somehow I doubt the author of this article has made it through medical school.

    I have studied religion, I have also studied biology and physics. And, one thing I have realized is that scientific rationalism is not healthy for the vast majority of the populace. First of all, it can very easily lead to Nietzchean or Machiavellian ideologies in people, which are detrimental sociologically to many individuals who hold them, and certainly detrimental to those they would oppress. The simple, but extreme, philosophies of Jesus of Nazareth I find to be some of the most progressive in the world.

    I think most of the courage of Christ to grant grace to a prostitute who approached him in the governor's estate, or to refuse to put someone to death, or to emphasize the pathogenic nature of greed, violence, and un-forgiveness. Christ was so easily able to sway large amounts of people because the Romans and Sadducees were so wrapped up in their complex and abstract conceptions of law, control and philosophy. So, a regular guy came along and started teaching a very simple, and extremely empathetic philosophy and was able to conquer all of Western Civilization, to a degree, by simply appealing to common people.

    The average citizen cannot memorize all the reasons evolution is true, and it is of little detriment to them if they go to their grave believing that an omniscient being not only loves and cares for them individually, but will welcome them in the afterlife. In fact, such a paradigm is very psychologically healthy as it is a permanent state of hope for many people for which it is otherwise out of reach.

    Christianity has been dreadfully perverted by the religious right.

    However, when my Zoology teacher puts out stories from "The Darwin Awards" to read at 'rest stations' during lab tests, I cannot help but remember that the person I once believed as God would never laugh at someone's early death.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Charles Hollahan 12:35 PM 12/4/12

    Who wants to eat an MD with a social disease? That goat was smart - as long as he's possessed he's safe!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. brublr 10:03 AM 12/5/12

    The undead zombie Jesus will return in a Cloud o' Glory

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. shanseuse in reply to bloomingdedalus 12:57 PM 12/6/12

    "The simple, but extreme, philosophies of Jesus of Nazareth I find to be some of the most progressive in the world."

    I agree. Unfortunately, most fundamentalist Christians do not share these philosophies.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. yak4love 07:26 AM 5/30/13

    Hi, I am helen
    how are you,hope you are fine and in perfect condition of health. I went through your profile and I read it and took interest in it,please if you don't mind I will like you to write me on this ID(helenyak11@yahoo.com)hope to hear from you soon,and I will be waiting for your mail because I have something VERY important to tell you. Never in my wildest dreams did I ever believe this would ever happen. I never expected to fall so deeply in love so fast. It all started after reading profile first. Lots of love helen

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

A Silent Goat Outwits a Talking MD: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X