Cover Image: March 2003 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Sizing Up Evangelicals [Preview]

Fundamentalism persists but shows signs of moderation















Share on Tumblr

undamentalism represents more than a continuation of traditional religion; it is also a transformation of old religious attitudes that arose in reaction to modernity and, in particular, Darwinism and progressive Protestantism. Its most prominent feature--the doctrine of biblical inerrancy--was a creation not of the 16th-century Reformation but of 19th-century Princeton University theologians attempting to preserve traditional belief in divine origins. Unlike the Calvinist tradition from which it grew, American fundamentalism is unsympathetic to science. After the Scopes "monkey trial" of 1925, it entered a quiescent period, reawakening in the 1960s and 1970s as a reaction to feminism and events such as the U.S. Supreme Court's 1963 decision banning prayer in public schools and its 1973 decision overturning laws against abortion in 46 states.

In the U.S., fundamentalism is one of several strains of evangelistic religion, which also includes charismatics and Pentecostals. Tracking the course of fundamentalism and its sister beliefs has long been difficult, in part because church statistics are unreliable and incomplete. Furthermore, fundamentalists and other evangelicals are not confined to certain denominations. Only 57 percent of Southern Baptists believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible, whereas about a fourth of the clergy in one typical division of the United Methodist Church, the biggest mainline Protestant denomination, participates in evangelical renewal movements. Catholics who call themselves charismatic can fall under the evangelical classification.


This article was originally published with the title Sizing Up Evangelicals.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

  • docfreeride This season of Mad Men, I'm actively rooting for someone to kill Don Draper. Too much collateral damage if we wait for his redemption.
    13 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • mdichristina @MRAKdesign Looks like rain for today--presume you sent it here?!
    17 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • huler Trying, failing to spend money on Delta Airlines. Unnavigable website. 2+ hours hold time. But -- they promise to call me when it's my turn.
    1 hour ago · reply · retweet · favorite
More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Sizing Up Evangelicals: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X