Brominated Battle: Soda Chemical Has Cloudy Health History

Some scientists now urge a reassessment of 'BVO' because they wonder whether it has some of the same risks as brominated flame retardants















Share on Tumblr

"There are many options to substitute BVO with safe chemicals," Vetter said. "I am not aware of significant disadvantages of BVO over hydrocolloids or vice versa."

With natural alternatives already in use in other countries, why not switch in North America too?

Wim Thielemans, a chemical engineer at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom, said since the alternatives are already used in Europe "their performance must be acceptable, if not comparable, to the U.S.-used brominated systems." That means "the main driver for not replacing them may be cost," he said.

"It is a North American problem," Vetter added. "In the E.U., BVO will never be permitted."

This article originally ran at Environmental Health News, a news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.



« Prev 1 2 3 4 5

10 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. ozrkmtndd 08:09 PM 12/12/11

    I know that it wasn't a comprehensive list of soda's, however, I also know that I get a headache whenever I drink the soda in question. I don't know that there is a connection, but still . . .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. TigerWild 01:11 PM 12/13/11

    I believe whole-heartedly that this is truly a hidden issue that needs a strong review.

    Soda-pop in general is dangerous in only decently large quantities. My aunt had all of her body fat cut out to remove cancer that was directly tied (by her doctors) to drinking 2 2L diet cokes a day.

    I personally stopped using styrofoam plates and other plastics in microwaves because of the leaching chemicals as they degrade in use. I even have banned the use of certain types of plastic biodegradeable cups like the ones that 7-Eleven uses. You can TASTE the cup degrading and modifying the flavor of your drink in only minutes! For that test I recommend either Pepsi or Coke as they, for me, have to most effect as noted.

    Conscientiously responsible use of all of these chemicals would, in my opinion, entail stating that they ARE PRESENT, AND what the over-consumption of them may cause.

    My vote is to further the label system that we have for nutrition facts, and cover the extra chemicals/food colorings used in foods. For plastics and foams that people are exposed to regularly come up with something better. My stray Thought on this, maybe use wax covered styrofoam to prevent leached chemicals? Something more than nothing needs done.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. alan6302 04:40 PM 12/13/11

    All foods modified by humans is likely garbage.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. neilrued 10:59 PM 12/13/11

    I live in Australia, and reading from the label on my Sunkist bottle the ingredients are:
    Carbonated water
    Sugar
    Food acid (330)
    Flavour
    Preservative (211)
    Colour (110)

    Packed by Schweppes Australia under licence from Sunkist Growers, Inc.

    No mention of the presence of BVO.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. JacobSilver 04:05 PM 12/14/11

    The FDA may be OK when approving drugs, but its record with regard to nutrition is abysmal. BVO is just one of the many toxins they permit in prepared foods. They also over-pasteurize foods, including those with no justification at all for pasteurization, to reduce the nutrition of these foods. Big business is their guide, which leads to the reduction of healthfulness and nutrition to that of the levels of factory farms and commercial agriculture.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Geopelia 03:08 PM 12/15/11

    With the high price of milk in New Zealand, it is cheaper to give children these fizzy drinks. Some families do.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. CaveatMTor 12:36 PM 11/24/12

    While BVO may pose a very remote threat - and deserves a current study to determine whether it does - There are other threats, well-documented and orders of magnitude larger, resulting from both excessive soda consumption and excessive gaming, especially excessive war gaming.

    Consumption of excess "empty" calories is a major factor in the current epidemic of obesity, with all its correlated health problems and lowered life expectancy. Excessive gaming, and the lack of physical activity which results, also contributes to obesity and a general lack of physical fitness. The lower consumption of healthful foods (displaced by sugar) can cause vitamin or mineral deficiencies.

    Last, excessive war gaming causes a desensitivity to the negative side of mass murder and war. We are training our next generation of enthusiastic cannon fodder. This is good for the military-industrial complex, bad for the rest of the world.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Ctwalter in reply to TigerWild 02:03 PM 1/3/13

    Hey Null, Your sentiment or feelings are good and well intentioned, but the same people in charge of Labeling laws are the same pack of bureaucrats and officials who take your taxes for their salaries and all the other expenses of their office while they accept studies conducted or sponsored by the commercial interests trying to get a certain chemical or compound approved for use.

    The real fix is two fold. First, people must be educated and educate them selves with out the pseudo science that fills alot of public discourse. Public schools are also a great source of usuless education and non-existence teaching of critical thinking skills. Second, the entire government structure that promises to protect us from our selves but instead simply grows ever more bloated on its own power and our wealth has to be radically reformed.

    We, as human beings are responsible for what we eat and drink and do to our selves. Our culture, not our labeling laws, is broken. We eat, drink, and smoke unhealthy garbage, patting our selves on the backs for having an FDA to keep evil chemicals out of our diets. All the Alphabet agencies in this country can not replace common sense. I recommend that you never eat anything your great grandmother wouldn't recommend as food.

    I am not against accurate labeling of ingredients and do believe that companies who add toxins and other junk should be held responsible, but it will never, never happen in this current political environment and while people are content to let government grow unchecked with out limits. This is to a body politic what cancer is to the human body. Besides, the FDA is too busy raiding farms and business that deal in raw milk products.

    The real solution is individual responsibility and the vast power of knowledge.
    Happy New Year to you and yours.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Ctwalter in reply to TigerWild 02:03 PM 1/3/13

    Hey Null, Your sentiment or feelings are good and well intentioned, but the same people in charge of Labeling laws are the same pack of bureaucrats and officials who take your taxes for their salaries and all the other expenses of their office while they accept studies conducted or sponsored by the commercial interests trying to get a certain chemical or compound approved for use.

    The real fix is two fold. First, people must be educated and educate them selves with out the pseudo science that fills alot of public discourse. Public schools are also a great source of usuless education and non-existence teaching of critical thinking skills. Second, the entire government structure that promises to protect us from our selves but instead simply grows ever more bloated on its own power and our wealth has to be radically reformed.

    We, as human beings are responsible for what we eat and drink and do to our selves. Our culture, not our labeling laws, is broken. We eat, drink, and smoke unhealthy garbage, patting our selves on the backs for having an FDA to keep evil chemicals out of our diets. All the Alphabet agencies in this country can not replace common sense. I recommend that you never eat anything your great grandmother wouldn't recommend as food.

    I am not against accurate labeling of ingredients and do believe that companies who add toxins and other junk should be held responsible, but it will never, never happen in this current political environment and while people are content to let government grow unchecked with out limits. This is to a body politic what cancer is to the human body. Besides, the FDA is too busy raiding farms and business that deal in raw milk products.

    The real solution is individual responsibility and the vast power of knowledge.
    Happy New Year to you and yours.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. K98405 04:33 AM 5/16/13

    I see some comments from people outside of the U.S. that BVO is not listed in their Mt Dew. Since most other countries ban this ingredient, I do not see why they cannot do that here in the U.S. ? They have already banned it in Gatorade here, but not the soda(s). I understand how it binds the citrus in these drinks, but seems where it is banned, they found a better and safer way. Don't see why not do that here.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Brominated Battle: Soda Chemical Has Cloudy Health History

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X