Greenhouse gases have taken much of the blame for rising global surface temperatures over the past century. The results of a new study suggest that soot has done a fair amount of damage as well.

In a paper published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, James E. Hansen of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Larissa Nazarenko of Columbia University report that soot may have caused fully 25 percent of the warming observed since 1880. The researchers focused on the effects of black carbon on snow albedo---that is, its ability to reflect sunlight back into space. As it turns out, dark, sooty snow absorbs significantly more solar energy than clean, white snow does. This creates positive feedback, with the black carbon melting the snow, thus concentrating the soot density, which in turn leads to the absorption of even more heat. Indeed, Hansen and Nazarenko determined that the contaminating particles raise temperatures twice as effectively as carbon dioxide does. This activity, they observe, may be partly responsible for the trend toward earlier springs in the Northern Hemisphere, thinning Arctic sea ice and shrinking glaciers.

Hansen notes that greenhouse gases are still the primary cause of climate warming during the past century and will continue to be the predominant agent of warming in the future. The good news is that soot emissions may be more easily lowered than the greenhouse gas variety. "Technology is within reach that could greatly reduce soot," the researchers write, "restoring snow albedo to near-pristine values, while having multiple other benefits for climate, human health, agricultural productivity, and environmental esthetics."

1 Comments

1. 1. Michael Cook 03:29 PM 12/5/09

   Somebody in my neighborhood today is burning coal in their woodstove and it stinks like crazy. It reminds my wife and I of China when we visited last year. The USA is already doing well on reducing soot, but China and India certainly are not.
   
   Take a nice cruise on any Chinese river and you will see huge processions of coal barges headed to power plants that do not have scrubbers on their stacks.
   
   James E. Hanson has a nice sense of self-preservation--when the main thesis falters, he actually is able to dig down and come up with some good thinking.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this